linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Cc: "Artur Świgoń" <a.swigon@partner.samsung.com>,
	"Abel Vesa" <abel.vesa@nxp.com>,
	"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@google.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
	"Lukasz Luba" <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>,
	"Chanwoo Choi" <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	"Kyungmin Park" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	"MyungJoo Ham" <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	"Alexandre Bailon" <abailon@baylibre.com>,
	"Georgi Djakov" <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Jacky Bai" <ping.bai@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] PM / devfreq: Move more initialization before registration
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:10:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190923181057.GY133864@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ad496507cd7e6731e46249b1499dfdebe205c16.1569252537.git.leonard.crestez@nxp.com>

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 06:51:05PM +0300, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> In general it is a better to initialize an object before making it
> accessible externally (through device_register).
> 
> This makes it possible to avoid relying on locking a partially
> initialized object.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> index 323d43315d1e..b4d2bfebb140 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> @@ -587,10 +587,12 @@ static void devfreq_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  	mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>  
>  	if (devfreq->profile->exit)
>  		devfreq->profile->exit(devfreq->dev.parent);
>  
> +	kfree(devfreq->time_in_state);
> +	kfree(devfreq->trans_table);
>  	mutex_destroy(&devfreq->lock);
>  	kfree(devfreq);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -670,44 +672,43 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>  	devfreq->max_freq = devfreq->scaling_max_freq;
>  
>  	devfreq->suspend_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq(dev);
>  	atomic_set(&devfreq->suspend_count, 0);
>  
> -	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "devfreq%d",
> -				atomic_inc_return(&devfreq_no));
> -	err = device_register(&devfreq->dev);
> -	if (err) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
> -		put_device(&devfreq->dev);
> -		goto err_out;
> -	}
> -
> -	devfreq->trans_table = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev,
> +	devfreq->trans_table = kzalloc(
>  			array3_size(sizeof(unsigned int),
>  				    devfreq->profile->max_state,
>  				    devfreq->profile->max_state),
>  			GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!devfreq->trans_table) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
>  		err = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto err_devfreq;
> +		goto err_dev;
>  	}
>  
> -	devfreq->time_in_state = devm_kcalloc(&devfreq->dev,
> -			devfreq->profile->max_state,
> -			sizeof(unsigned long),
> -			GFP_KERNEL);
> +	devfreq->time_in_state = kcalloc(devfreq->profile->max_state,
> +					 sizeof(unsigned long),
> +					 GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!devfreq->time_in_state) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
>  		err = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto err_devfreq;
> +		goto err_dev;
>  	}
>  
>  	devfreq->last_stat_updated = jiffies;
>  
>  	srcu_init_notifier_head(&devfreq->transition_notifier_list);
>  
> +	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "devfreq%d",
> +				atomic_inc_return(&devfreq_no));
> +	err = device_register(&devfreq->dev);
> +	if (err) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
> +		put_device(&devfreq->dev);
> +		goto err_out;

As per my comment on v5 I think the goto needs to go to 'err_dev'. The
device registration failed, hence devfreq_dev_release() won't be
called to free allocated memory.

> +	}
> +
>  	mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>  
>  	governor = try_then_request_governor(devfreq->governor_name);
> @@ -733,14 +734,20 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	return devfreq;
>  
>  err_init:
>  	mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
> -err_devfreq:
>  	devfreq_remove_device(devfreq);
> -	devfreq = NULL;
> +	return ERR_PTR(err);
> +
>  err_dev:
> +	/*
> +	 * Cleanup path for errors that happen before registration.
> +	 * Otherwise we rely on devfreq_dev_release

nit: add a period at the end of the second sentence.

> +	 */
> +	kfree(devfreq->time_in_state);
> +	kfree(devfreq->trans_table);
>  	kfree(devfreq);
>  err_out:
>  	return ERR_PTR(err);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(devfreq_add_device);

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-23 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-23 15:51 [PATCH v6 0/6] PM / devfreq: Add dev_pm_qos support Leonard Crestez
2019-09-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] PM / devfreq: Don't fail devfreq_dev_release if not in list Leonard Crestez
2019-09-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] PM / devfreq: Move more initialization before registration Leonard Crestez
2019-09-23 18:10   ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2019-09-23 18:56     ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-23 19:11       ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-23 19:56         ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-23 21:17           ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] PM / devfreq: Don't take lock in devfreq_add_device Leonard Crestez
2019-09-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] PM / devfreq: Introduce devfreq_get_freq_range Leonard Crestez
2019-09-23 18:16   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] PM / devfreq: Add PM QoS support Leonard Crestez
2019-09-23 18:28   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] PM / devfreq: Use PM QoS for sysfs min/max_freq Leonard Crestez
2019-09-23 18:47   ` Matthias Kaehlcke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190923181057.GY133864@google.com \
    --to=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=a.swigon@partner.samsung.com \
    --cc=abailon@baylibre.com \
    --cc=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=l.luba@partner.samsung.com \
    --cc=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).