From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE7FECE58C for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 701DF21721 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Sx1ZpWo8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 701DF21721 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=slmpiggds4bipnDlmtp13NdaMW057X4K9KT+6jh/kQk=; b=Sx1ZpWo8Q5vXXA nFhT0C0tkW3+ih0rULti3eNTbOUphXJFwlc4X0gcVDhlnhaA8gE3yQ3BAGbyC2bj52FXktg/DKlO8 as9CMheZhpMnXRQma65Mn9e63Ho8QkhkBgH5ZE/i3AdxYefWPQA39l3g076k4esR3A2j191GMJpvl UvSOLgj39EzsM1zncFPJV2erdHFbBrsF/RlAWmnMXup3tITopdaOfdnGSSXlSB5Far/ck6liDW2bF gu/Y2KUSAJ2Xwz52xHpTUkW/HZaK1EnJL6vdbhTtWR6234iOuBwwzrNasuYGAH+dmdnkyOq2Inf7v BM3vYtysg8I0+yjwfXJg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iHUzp-0000iw-TY; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 15:32:25 +0000 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iHUzm-0000h6-45 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 15:32:24 +0000 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 803B2316; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 09:32:08 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Gerald BAEZA Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add link to stm32mp157 docs Message-ID: <20191007093208.757554b0@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <8d097a0486e94257952600bf6d20975d@SFHDAG5NODE1.st.com> References: <1566908347-92201-1-git-send-email-gerald.baeza@st.com> <20190827074825.64a28e88@lwn.net> <5257eff7-418b-8e94-1ced-30718dd3f5dc@st.com> <8d097a0486e94257952600bf6d20975d@SFHDAG5NODE1.st.com> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191007_083222_161428_14732659 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.64 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alexandre TORGUE , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:05:46 +0000 Gerald BAEZA wrote: > > > Adding the URL is a fine idea. But you don't need the extra syntax to > > > create a link if you're not going to actually make a link out of it. > > > So I'd take the ".. _STM32MP157:" part out and life will be good. > > > > > > > We also did it for older stm32 product. Idea was to not have the "full" > > address but just a shortcut of the link when html file is read. It maybe makes > > no sens ? (if yes we will have to update older stm32 overview :)) > > Example in https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/arm/stm32/stm32h743-overview.html > > Do you agree to continue like this ? If you actually use the reference then it's OK, I guess; in the posted document that wasn't happening. I still think it might be a bit more straightforward to just put the URL; that will make the plain-text file a little more readable. In the end, though, it's up to you, go with whichever you prefer. Thanks, jon _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel