From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ARM Juno r1 + CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y => boot failure
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:59:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011105923.GB5122@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7655fb41-cd13-0bc4-e656-040e0875bab8@arm.com>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:38:17AM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On 11/10/2019 11:05, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >> Recently I've got access to ARM Juno R1 board and did some tests with
> >> current mainline kernel on it. I'm a bit surprised that enabling
> >> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING causes a boot failure on this board. After enabling
> >> this Kconfig option, I get no single message from the kernel, although I
> >> have earlycon enabled.
>
> > I don't have Juno R1 but I tried defconfig + CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and
> > it boots fine.
>
> I just tried this on my r1, v5.4-rc1 with this configuration worked just fine.
>
> My cmdline is:
> | root=/dev/sda6 loglevel=9 earlycon=pl011,0x7ff80000 hugepagesz=2M hugepages=512
> | crashkernel=1G console=ttyAMA0 resume=/dev/sda2 no_console_suspend efi=debug
>
>
> >> I've did my test with default defconfig and current linux-next,
> >> v5.4-rc1, v5.3 and v4.19. In all cases the result is the same. I'm
> >> booting kernel using a precompiled uboot from Linaro release and TFTP
> >> download.
>
> > OK, I use UEFI+GRUB but I don't think that should cause any issue.
>
> ... same ... this uboot binary looks like the main difference.
> Is it using u-boots UEFI support? Is it possible to turn that off?
>
Did give a quick try with mainline uboot on my Juno R2 and it boots fine.
Not sure if EFI support is default there. I am using vexpress_aemv8a_juno_defconfig
> It may that lockdep is just perturbing the size of the binary. It adds an
> extra 4MB for me.
The image size was 35MB.
I was thinking if it has some wrongly configured firmware, but since
defconfig works, it must have sane firmware.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20191011092604eucas1p1ca11ab9c4c7508776914b0eb4f35e69b@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
[not found] ` <33a83dce-e9f0-7814-923b-763d33e70257@samsung.com>
2019-10-11 10:05 ` ARM Juno r1 + CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y => boot failure Sudeep Holla
2019-10-11 10:21 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-11 10:38 ` James Morse
2019-10-11 10:59 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-10-11 13:02 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-11 13:10 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-11 13:15 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-11 13:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-11 14:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-14 9:02 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-14 10:16 ` James Morse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191011105923.GB5122@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox