From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Coresight ML <coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] perf cs-etm: Fix unsigned variable comparison to zero
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:16:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011201606.GC13688@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191005091614.11635-2-leo.yan@linaro.org>
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 05:16:09PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> If the u64 variable 'offset' is a negative integer, comparison it with
> bigger than zero is always going to be true because it is unsigned.
> Fix this by using s64 type for variable 'offset'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index 4ba0f871f086..4bc2d9709d4f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> @@ -940,7 +940,7 @@ u64 cs_etm__last_executed_instr(const struct cs_etm_packet *packet)
> static inline u64 cs_etm__instr_addr(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> u64 trace_chan_id,
> const struct cs_etm_packet *packet,
> - u64 offset)
> + s64 offset)
In Suzuki's reply there was two choices, 1) move the while(offset > 0) to
while (offset) or change the type of @offset to an s64. Here we know offset
can't be negative because of the
tidq->period_instructions >= etm->instructions_sample_period
in function cs_etm__sample(). As such I think option #1 is the right way to
deal with this rather than changing the type of the variable.
Mathieu
> {
> if (packet->isa == CS_ETM_ISA_T32) {
> u64 addr = packet->start_addr;
> @@ -1372,7 +1372,7 @@ static int cs_etm__sample(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> * sample is reported as though instruction has just been
> * executed, but PC has not advanced to next instruction)
> */
> - u64 offset = (instrs_executed - instrs_over - 1);
> + s64 offset = (instrs_executed - instrs_over - 1);
> u64 addr = cs_etm__instr_addr(etmq, trace_chan_id,
> tidq->packet, offset);
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-05 9:16 [PATCH v3 0/6] perf cs-etm: Support thread stack and callchain Leo Yan
2019-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] perf cs-etm: Fix unsigned variable comparison to zero Leo Yan
2019-10-11 20:16 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2019-10-22 5:10 ` Leo Yan
2019-10-22 23:36 ` Mike Leach
2019-10-23 6:49 ` Leo Yan
2019-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] perf cs-etm: Refactor instruction size handling Leo Yan
2019-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] perf cs-etm: Support thread stack Leo Yan
2019-10-11 17:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-10-15 3:33 ` Leo Yan
2019-10-22 5:03 ` Leo Yan
2019-10-28 22:43 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-10-29 4:11 ` Leo Yan
2019-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] perf cs-etm: Support branch filter Leo Yan
2019-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] perf cs-etm: Support callchain for instruction sample Leo Yan
2019-10-11 19:59 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] perf cs-etm: Synchronize instruction sample with the thread stack Leo Yan
2019-10-11 20:17 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-10-15 3:44 ` Leo Yan
2019-10-22 4:50 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191011201606.GC13688@xps15 \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox