From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C00FC4CECE for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F12D207FF for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="fdubuw2y"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ARrkQrHo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4F12D207FF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type:Cc: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=xX0YkNYOaOizV+P1FafV2MpkZO5fXovNboClS8vcYtQ=; b=fdubuw2yhBUhx6jW1qOsJBgrG Y+rUjBnStj1HPLbImgt4A6Jnq/Gqp4leEdSHCBdFcxeeQybSjdZZ4SIQWP7WKoV/Skz1C8oThLiBN e3pxModAcRSbA2kfBUN68k5zuAz+3F+DmS8MXiKkaBJyuBjUzu7K4/Zk6SzWEJitYtFda87A4/yIv iUX+1/eO5LSwfakMwymq3fZKj3LzYrER4zhGpNYWdsBu5IL/q5gZIBz2xRiTq4YxPh4aEFYa0ClgW YeIL6QdIzZOvQp30IqzGgJ+bfT3DY94Sui+rAz3tWhpsfKA8Gnz5c9Asr4DYv/kAH0N0u78z09/BA 0iSzZshnQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iJy5E-00045S-Ia; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:00:12 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iJy5B-000448-A3 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:00:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (lfbn-1-10718-76.w90-89.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.89.68.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61F9C207FF; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:00:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1571050808; bh=ZlGSWdazyQ+VJGnSWXQEMdj9sn2sA7OLQ6nosjRvcVs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ARrkQrHoYCU2xerLQcqUwNA9j7VvNbBzkuJMrer7cqklB+5MhejFy6YoIEB7gUDGM 6YyDja4j4e5cnKK6dFQ6VOGvaa+354POwCSP8t12y3RLqXS2cfH3RTWsEH6xX/09ob oeAR8H4mMIvyHAuu5DkVYaEWkuGPrvuF1n1qy8eU= Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 13:00:06 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Jagan Teki Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] dt-bindings: sun6i-dsi: Add A64 MIPI-DSI compatible Message-ID: <20191014110006.b324hccd52u7fotw@gilmour> References: <20191005141913.22020-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20191005141913.22020-2-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20191007093122.ixrpzvy6ynh6vuir@gilmour> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191014_040009_409721_DE8F72B0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.06 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree , David Airlie , linux-sunxi , dri-devel , linux-kernel , Chen-Yu Tsai , Rob Herring , Daniel Vetter , Michael Trimarchi , linux-arm-kernel , Icenowy Zheng Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3858845748784057491==" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --===============3858845748784057491== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ictolke544mhfqmp" Content-Disposition: inline --ictolke544mhfqmp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 10:32:18PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:01 PM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 07:49:08PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > The MIPI DSI controller in Allwinner A64 is similar to A33. > > > > > > But unlike A33, A64 doesn't have DSI_SCLK gating so it is valid > > > to with separate compatible for A64 on the same driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki > > > --- > > > .../bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml | 4 +++- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml > > > index dafc0980c4fa..cfcc84d38084 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml > > > @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ properties: > > > "#size-cells": true > > > > > > compatible: > > > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi > > > + enum: > > > + - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi > > > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dsi > > > > How did you test this? It will report an error when running the > > validation > > I did follow the v9 comments [1] and forgot to do dt-doc-validate. > will send the v11 for this patch alone, will that be okay? > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/307499/ There's some changes to the DTSI to do as well, so please do them, check that the device trees are validated properly, and send a new version. Maxime --ictolke544mhfqmp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCXaRVNgAKCRDj7w1vZxhR xdlEAP9MkHQgcCclQKzguGiRxdmXCb+BVwkeOWiDgHEs4bDIXgD/eQbRbeTOq1NN hIPooMFntNFWHosHxRdy9yw7y56jfg0= =FNyg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ictolke544mhfqmp-- --===============3858845748784057491== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============3858845748784057491==--