Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] perf cs-etm: Support thread stack

Mathieu Poirier
2019-10-28T22:44:15Z

On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 23:03, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:53:53AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 05:16:11PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > Since Arm CoreSight doesn't support thread stack, the decoding cannot
> > > display symbols with indented spaces to reflect the stack depth.
> > >
> > > This patch adds support thread stack for Arm CoreSight, this allows
> > > 'perf script' to display properly for option '-F,+callindent'.
> > >
> > > Before:
> > >
> > > # perf script -F,+callindent
> > > main 2808 1 branches: coresight_test1 ffff8634f5c8 coresight_test1+0x3c (/root/coresight_test/libcstest.so)
> > > main 2808 1 branches: printf@plt aaaaba8d37ec main+0x28 (/root/coresight_test/main)
> > > main 2808 1 branches: printf@plt aaaaba8d36bc printf@plt+0xc (/root/coresight_test/main)
> > > main 2808 1 branches: _init aaaaba8d3650 _init+0x30 (/root/coresight_test/main)
> > > main 2808 1 branches: _dl_fixup ffff86373b4c _dl_runtime_resolve+0x40 (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/ld-2.28.so)
> > > main 2808 1 branches: _dl_lookup_symbol_x ffff8636e078 _dl_fixup+0xb8 (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/ld-2.28.so)
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > After:
> > >
> > > # perf script -F,+callindent
> > > main 2808 1 branches: coresight_test1 ffff8634f5c8 coresight_test1+0x3c (/root/coresight_test/libcstest.so)
> > > main 2808 1 branches: printf@plt aaaaba8d37ec main+0x28 (/root/coresight_test/main)
> > > main 2808 1 branches: printf@plt aaaaba8d36bc printf@plt+0xc (/root/coresight_test/main)
> > > main 2808 1 branches: _init aaaaba8d3650 _init+0x30 (/root/coresight_test/main)
> > > main 2808 1 branches: _dl_fixup ffff86373b4c _dl_runtime_resolve+0x40 (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/ld-2.28.s
> > > main 2808 1 branches: _dl_lookup_symbol_x ffff8636e078 _dl_fixup+0xb8 (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/ld-2.28.so)
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > > index 58ceba7b91d5..780abbfd1833 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > > @@ -1117,6 +1117,45 @@ static void cs_etm__copy_insn(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> > > sample->insn_len, (void *)sample->insn);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void cs_etm__add_stack_event(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> > > + struct cs_etm_traceid_queue *tidq)
> > > +{
> > > + struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm = etmq->etm;
> > > + u8 trace_chan_id = tidq->trace_chan_id;
> > > + int insn_len;
> > > + u64 from_ip, to_ip;
> > > +
> > > + if (etm->synth_opts.thread_stack) {
> > > + from_ip = cs_etm__last_executed_instr(tidq->prev_packet);
> > > + to_ip = cs_etm__first_executed_instr(tidq->packet);
> > > +
> > > + insn_len = cs_etm__instr_size(etmq, trace_chan_id,
> > > + tidq->prev_packet->isa, from_ip);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Create thread stacks by keeping track of calls and returns;
> > > + * any call pushes thread stack, return pops the stack, and
> > > + * flush stack when the trace is discontinuous.
> > > + */
> > > + thread_stack__event(tidq->thread, tidq->prev_packet->cpu,
> > > + tidq->prev_packet->flags,
> > > + from_ip, to_ip, insn_len,
> > > + etmq->buffer->buffer_nr);
> >
> > Details are a little fuzzy in my head but I'm pretty sure
> > we want trace_chan_id here.
>
> I spent some time to look into this question, and I think we don't
> need to add extra info for trace_chan_id.
>
> The main reason is for CPU wide tracing, if one task is migrated from
> CPU_a to CPU_b, if we append 'trace_chan_id' for the buffer number, then
> it will tell the thread_stack that the buffer has been changed (or it
> will be considered the trace is discontinuous), then thread stack will
> be flushed. Actually, this is not what we want; if a task is migrated
> from one CPU to another, we still need to keep its thread stack if the
> trace data comes from the same buffer_nr.

After reviewing the code I conclude that using etmq->buffer->buffer_nr
is the correct way to proceed.

That being said you have sent this new set [1], which is a rework of
some of the code you have in the current set. As such the only way
forward is for you to wait until [1] I has been applied and rebase the
remaining work in this set on top of it.

Let me know if you have questions.

Thanks,
Mathieu

[1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11130213/

>
> To be honest, I struggled to understand what's the purpose for
> 'buffer->buffer_nr', from the code, I think 'buffer->buffer_nr' is
> mainly used to trace the splitted buffers (e.g. the buffers are splitted
> into different queues so the trace data coming from different trace
> chunk?). Now I observe 'buffer->buffer_nr' is always zero since the
> buffer is not used with splitted mode. If later we support 1:1 map
> between tracers and sinks, then we need to set 'buffer->buffer_nr' so
> can reflect the correct buffer mapping, but we don't need to use
> trace_chan_id as extra info at here.
>
> Please let me know what you think about this? If you agree with this,
> I will send out patch v4 soon with addressing other comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Leo Yan
>
> > > + } else {
> > > + /*
> > > + * The thread stack can be output via thread_stack__process();
> > > + * thus the detailed information about paired calls and returns
> > > + * will be facilitated by Python script for the db-export.
> > > + *
> > > + * Need to set trace buffer number and flush thread stack if the
> > > + * trace buffer number has been alternate.
> > > + */
> > > + thread_stack__set_trace_nr(tidq->thread,
> > > + tidq->prev_packet->cpu,
> > > + etmq->buffer->buffer_nr);
> >
> > Same here.
> >
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int cs_etm__synth_instruction_sample(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> > > struct cs_etm_traceid_queue *tidq,
> > > u64 addr, u64 period)
> > > @@ -1393,6 +1432,9 @@ static int cs_etm__sample(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> > > tidq->period_instructions = instrs_over;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (tidq->prev_packet->last_instr_taken_branch)
> > > + cs_etm__add_stack_event(etmq, tidq);
> > > +
> > > if (etm->sample_branches) {
> > > bool generate_sample = false;
> > >
> > > @@ -2593,6 +2635,8 @@ int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event,
> > > itrace_synth_opts__set_default(&etm->synth_opts,
> > > session->itrace_synth_opts->default_no_sample);
> > > etm->synth_opts.callchain = false;
> > > + etm->synth_opts.thread_stack =
> > > + session->itrace_synth_opts->thread_stack;
> > > }
> > >
> > > err = cs_etm__synth_events(etm, session);
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >