From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: jthierry@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, deller@gmx.de,
jpoimboe@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, mingo@redhat.com,
james.morse@arm.com, jeyu@kernel.org, amit.kachhap@arm.com,
svens@stackframe.org, duwe@suse.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] ftrace: add ftrace_init_nop()
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 12:28:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191022112811.GA11583@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021140756.613a1bac@gandalf.local.home>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:07:56PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:34:19 +0100
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>
> > Architectures may need to perform special initialization of ftrace
> > callsites, and today they do so by special-casing ftrace_make_nop() when
> > the expected branch address is MCOUNT_ADDR. In some cases (e.g. for
> > patchable-function-entry), we don't have an mcount-like symbol and don't
> > want a synthetic MCOUNT_ADDR, but we may need to perform some
> > initialization of callsites.
> >
> > To make it possible to separate initialization from runtime
> > modification, and to handle cases without an mcount-like symbol, this
> > patch adds an optional ftrace_init_nop() function that architectures can
> > implement, which does not pass a branch address.
> >
> > Where an architecture does not provide ftrace_init_nop(), we will fall
> > back to the existing behaviour of calling ftrace_make_nop() with
> > MCOUNT_ADDR.
> >
> > At the same time, ftrace_code_disable() is renamed to
> > ftrace_code_init_disabled() to make it clearer that it is intended to
> > intialize a callsite into a disabled state, and is not for disabling a
> > callsite that has been runtime enabled.
>
> To make the name even better, let's just rename it to:
>
> ftrace_nop_initialization()
>
> I think that may be the best description for it.
Perhaps ftrace_nop_initialize(), so that it's not a noun?
I've made it ftrace_nop_initialization() in my branch for now.
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > index f296d89be757..afd7e210e595 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > @@ -2493,15 +2493,22 @@ struct dyn_ftrace *ftrace_rec_iter_record(struct ftrace_rec_iter *iter)
> > return &iter->pg->records[iter->index];
> > }
> >
> > +#ifndef ftrace_init_nop
> > +static int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
> > +{
> > + return ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> Can you place the above in the ftrace.h header. That's where that would
> belong.
>
> #ifndef ftrace_init_nop
> struct module;
> static inline int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
> {
> return ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
> }
> #endif
True.
I've put this immediately after ftrace_make_nop() in the header, and
given it a kerneldoc comment. There's a declaration for struct module at
the top of the header, so I've just relied on that
That looks like:
| /**
| * ftrace_init_nop - initialize a nop call site
| * @mod: module structure if called by module load initialization
| * @rec: the mcount call site record
| *
| * This is a very sensitive operation and great care needs
| * to be taken by the arch. The operation should carefully
| * read the location, check to see if what is read is indeed
| * what we expect it to be, and then on success of the compare,
| * it should write to the location.
| *
| * The code segment at @rec->ip should be as initialized by the
| * compiler
| *
| * Return must be:
| * 0 on success
| * -EFAULT on error reading the location
| * -EINVAL on a failed compare of the contents
| * -EPERM on error writing to the location
| * Any other value will be considered a failure.
| */
| #ifndef ftrace_init_nop
| static int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
| {
| return ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
| }
| #endif
Thanks,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-22 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 16:34 [PATCH 0/8] arm64: ftrace cleanup + FTRACE_WITH_REGS Mark Rutland
2019-10-21 16:34 ` [PATCH 1/8] ftrace: add ftrace_init_nop() Mark Rutland
2019-10-21 18:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 11:28 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-10-22 12:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 15:30 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-22 15:33 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-22 16:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-21 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/8] module/ftrace: handle patchable-function-entry Mark Rutland
2019-10-21 16:34 ` [PATCH 3/8] arm64: module: rework special section handling Mark Rutland
2019-10-21 16:34 ` [PATCH 4/8] arm64: module/ftrace: intialize PLT at load time Mark Rutland
2019-10-21 16:34 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm64: insn: add encoder for MOV (register) Mark Rutland
2019-10-21 16:34 ` [PATCH 6/8] arm64: asm-offsets: add S_FP Mark Rutland
2019-10-21 16:34 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm64: implement ftrace with regs Mark Rutland
2019-10-21 16:34 ` [PATCH 8/8] arm64: ftrace: minimize ifdeffery Mark Rutland
2019-10-24 16:32 ` [PATCH 0/8] arm64: ftrace cleanup + FTRACE_WITH_REGS Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191022112811.GA11583@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=duwe@suse.de \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=svens@stackframe.org \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox