public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s3c64xx: Remove pointless NULL check in s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:59:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191023165923.GL5723@sirena.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023165417.GA15082@ubuntu-m2-xlarge-x86>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 644 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 09:54:17AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:36:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 09:26:28AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:43:04AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > > The driver should also have supported s3c6400 as well.

> > > Kconfig says otherwise, unless I am missing something.

> > Note the XX in the config option.

> But what about the depends and the help text?

Viresh asked why the driver was written with s3c6410 support optional.
I explained that the reason that it was written this way was to
accomodate s3c6400 support.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-23 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-23  0:09 [PATCH] cpufreq: s3c64xx: Remove pointless NULL check in s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init Nathan Chancellor
2019-10-23  3:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-23 10:43   ` Mark Brown
2019-10-23 16:26     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-10-23 16:36       ` Mark Brown
2019-10-23 16:54         ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-10-23 16:59           ` Mark Brown [this message]
2019-10-23 17:03             ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-10-24  3:13 ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191023165923.GL5723@sirena.co.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox