From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D216ACA9EB9 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 02:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A65622084C for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 02:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="PPoec9z/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A65622084C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=O0IPos6sshALWUdXjwxt0fRmubErMAIv7PEZWeqaKNg=; b=PPoec9z/eAU7RS lxyiYMQ7HWjLDI/FRwxdF0sy7IXPUL2Qaw6dSgfWCYy3JhadbPrl7LyzN1RCJVyPRG5bWdfpsy5je +yIYCxahfbqWG0o22C8+xHs6sK+mfZdPeXN03xWz6pjBwaC/sKvrwJnDZTiNk0WMNB3Y3wM/e1ttA vvjwD/zH/kMHLQNpRsuF0ppllgBuFMrY+SDS8/e2b2PsbkJ39va+tEvR40APZhbEkF6ZtmbVFwOzV 5oj78crkLNVuK9OjUADQjU1S3OYHLi0lWsHGMC7ptSLOE21+iojPn+/aPVZ4xzF3LAEaqU6w47AhD s1PLpfxCJNPLaj/g/2MA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iOYO2-0008Le-7p; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 02:34:34 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iOYNz-0008L6-06 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 02:34:32 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27421FB; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 19:34:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107533-lin.cambridge.arm.com (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AF503F6C4; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 19:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 02:34:14 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] cpuidle: psci: Manage runtime PM in the idle path Message-ID: <20191027023414.GE18111@e107533-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20191010113937.15962-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20191010113937.15962-13-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20191024163257.GC22036@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191026_193431_128378_3CCDDFD0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.33 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Linux PM , Stephen Boyd , linux-arm-msm , Daniel Lezcano , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Lina Iyer , Bjorn Andersson , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 07:00:38PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 18:33, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 01:39:36PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > In case we have succeeded to attach a CPU to its PM domain, let's deploy > > > runtime PM support for the corresponding attached device, to allow the CPU > > > to be powered-managed accordingly. > > > > > > To set the triggering point for when runtime PM reference counting should > > > be done, let's store the index of deepest idle state for the CPU in the per > > > CPU struct. Then use this index to compare the selected idle state index > > > when entering idle, as to understand whether runtime PM reference counting > > > is needed or not. > > > > > > Note that, from the hierarchical point view, there may be good reasons to > > > do runtime PM reference counting even on shallower idle states, but at this > > > point this isn't supported, mainly due to limitations set by the generic PM > > > domain. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson > > > --- > > > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c > > > index 1510422c7a53..0919b40c1a85 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c > > > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c > > > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > +#include > > > #include > > > > > > #include > > > @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@ > > > > > > struct psci_cpuidle_data { > > > u32 *psci_states; > > > + u32 rpm_state_id; > > > struct device *dev; > > > }; > > > > > > @@ -50,14 +52,28 @@ static int psci_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, > > > struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx) > > > { > > > int ret; > > > - u32 *states = __this_cpu_read(psci_cpuidle_data.psci_states); > > > - u32 state = psci_get_domain_state(); > > > + struct psci_cpuidle_data *data = this_cpu_ptr(&psci_cpuidle_data); > > > + u32 *states = data->psci_states; > > > + struct device *pd_dev = data->dev; > > > + bool runtime_pm = (pd_dev && data->rpm_state_id == idx); > > > + u32 state; > > > > Wonder if we can have separate psci_enter_idle_state for OSI mode so > > that all these runtime extra check can be reduced ? It will also make > > sure there's no additional latency for PC mode because of OSI. > > Good idea, that's the plan. See previous answer. > > Perhaps if I add a patch on top, implementing your suggestion, would > you be happy with that? No, I prefer to amend this itself to keep it easy to be able to bisect. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel