From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0FBCA9EC5 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D38D20578 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="rAMnZ9O5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4D38D20578 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=JlBGhDp1rfYCz4n8pyowwKmBJTI7KKnPFowZYJNNvHc=; b=rAMnZ9O5cvHMs3 IGSxmXnBp4jBNXjTVv8ojX3qBrfH3FPAJ1FXLr4RJwv9fTl5pqVVsABmS0Y3qtWs/A0yqW7Q8/i9N 6vB4CyaedsEIKIGTNA2sRfVUEW7IpbguWmCzPsB5sDrhwzLrs1mgfAyWcwcWWwXzTRuItRyRpZTqg fNgtuHmgGUud3VHFn+3ta8/+bAr+lflmc6HvEcTpTiaKy1EtpDfGehQjQGjpn0yYLABu9IPNbLxUe 1vpF5FFcv02gvDGayc3puOf8REmH1BtX5W0jnAW8seOeKuaE4w4MNwFZwczNTwUxmZ/nfS5psLmfg rE6eoSEDXNe7cedjfvUg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iPon7-0000uq-Ds; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:17:41 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iPon4-0000uY-F0 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:17:39 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925BE1FB; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 07:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arrakis.emea.arm.com (arrakis.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 062473F6C4; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 07:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:17:32 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: Use a variable to store non-global mappings decision Message-ID: <20191030141732.GA13309@arrakis.emea.arm.com> References: <20191024214207.20588-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20191024214207.20588-5-broonie@kernel.org> <20191030121307.GB10294@arrakis.emea.arm.com> <20191030124153.GB7218@sirena.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191030124153.GB7218@sirena.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191030_071738_548330_5B04860C X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.79 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:41:53PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > BTW it'd be rather helpful to get patch 1 applied due to the constant > conflicts in cpufeature.h, it's safe by itself. Since we moved to using topic for-next/* branches, usually based on -rc3, I'd rather see patch series on top of the vanilla kernel. We can handle the trivial conflicts. Of course, if there is functional dependency, we can discuss which branch to base it on but I'd avoid for-next/core as a base as that's rather volatile. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel