From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Coresight ML <coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Robert Walker <robert.walker@arm.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] perf cs-etm: Fix synthesizing instruction samples
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:10:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191101021055.GA26019@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANLsYkzaB2kU20ibuDJVokYeEEuR8wd7MoHzX9+UKnM0jNV1Jg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:14:15AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 09:15, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > This patch series is to address the issue for synthesizing instruction
> > samples, especially when the instruction sample period is small enough,
> > the current logic cannot synthesize multiple instruction samples within
> > one instruction range packet.
> >
> > To fix this issue, patch 0001 avoids to reset the last branches for
> > every instruction sample; if reset the last branches when every time
> > generate instruction sample, then the later samples in the same range
> > packet cannot use the last branches anymore.
> >
> > Patch 0002 is the main patch to fix the logic for synthesizing
> > instruction samples; it allows to handle different instruction periods.
> >
> > Patch 0003 is an optimization for copying last branches; it only copies
> > last branches once if the instruction samples share the same last
> > branches.
> >
> > Patch 0004 is a minor fix for unsigned variable comparison to zero.
> >
> > To verify my changing for synthesizing instruction samples, I added
> > some logs in the code, and reviewed the output log manually for
> > instuctions samples. The below commands are tested on DB410c board:
> >
> > # perf script --itrace=i2
> > # perf script --itrace=i2li16
> > # perf inject --itrace=i2il16 -i perf.data -o perf.data.new
> > # perf inject --itrace=i100il16 -i perf.data -o perf.data.new
> >
> >
> > Leo Yan (4):
> > perf cs-etm: Continuously record last branches
> > perf cs-etm: Correct synthesizing instruction samples
> > perf cs-etm: Optimize copying last branches
> > perf cs-etm: Fix unsigned variable comparison to zero
>
> I have reviewed and agree with the changes in this set but won't move
> forward until Mike has looked at patch 2/4.
Thanks a lot for reviewing, Mathieu.
Sorry I forgot to loop Mike in this patch set, and respin patch for v2
and have sent to mailing list. @Mike, please review patch set v2 as
you received, Thanks!
Thanks,
Leo Yan
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-01 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-24 15:13 [PATCH v1 0/4] perf cs-etm: Fix synthesizing instruction samples Leo Yan
2019-10-24 15:13 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] perf cs-etm: Continuously record last branches Leo Yan
2019-10-24 15:13 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] perf cs-etm: Correct synthesizing instruction samples Leo Yan
2019-10-24 15:13 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] perf cs-etm: Optimize copying last branches Leo Yan
2019-10-24 15:13 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] perf cs-etm: Fix unsigned variable comparison to zero Leo Yan
2019-10-31 17:14 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] perf cs-etm: Fix synthesizing instruction samples Mathieu Poirier
2019-11-01 2:10 ` Leo Yan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191101021055.GA26019@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s \
--to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.walker@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox