linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Yabin Cui <yabinc@google.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] coresight: replicator: Fix missing spin_lock_init()
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 13:05:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191108100540.GQ10409@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANLsYkxKAC9FLYkFjuehj_oFHTVyd=8_R8bAKjPxTXQyAGkwYw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 11:47:11AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 04:57, Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > The driver allocates the spinlock but not initialize it.
> > Use spin_lock_init() on it to initialize it correctly.
> >
> > This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.
> >
> > Fixes: 0093875ad129 ("coresight: Serialize enabling/disabling a link device.")
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> > index 43304196a1a6..e7dc1c31d20d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> > @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static int replicator_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *res)
> >         }
> >         dev->platform_data = pdata;
> >
> > +       spin_lock_init(&drvdata->spinlock);
> 
> I have applied both patches but removed the "Fixes" line since the
> commit is only visible in my local coresight next tree.
> 

Unless you rebase the tree, then the Fixes tag will still be valid.
(Probably local implies you rebase it I guess).

regards,
dan carpenter


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2019-11-08 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-06 11:56 [PATCH -next] coresight: replicator: Fix missing spin_lock_init() Wei Yongjun
2019-11-06 18:49 ` Yabin Cui
2019-11-07 18:47 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-11-08 10:05   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191108100540.GQ10409@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=yabinc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).