From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Matt Hart <matthew.hart@linaro.org>,
mgalka@collabora.com,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: rmk/for-next bisection: boot on ox820-cloudengines-pogoplug-series-3
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 10:49:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191116104932.GT25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_r2Cb3d3OXaOdYy+4V9noL6exJoK6pHevUm2WfPzsr1g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 10:26:27AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> (+ Arnd)
>
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 05:54, kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> wrote:
> >
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > * This automated bisection report was sent to you on the basis *
> > * that you may be involved with the breaking commit it has *
> > * found. No manual investigation has been done to verify it, *
> > * and the root cause of the problem may be somewhere else. *
> > * *
> > * If you do send a fix, please include this trailer: *
> > * Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org> *
> > * *
> > * Hope this helps! *
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> >
> > rmk/for-next bisection: boot on ox820-cloudengines-pogoplug-series-3
> >
> > Summary:
> > Start: b6c3c42cfda0 ARM: 8938/1: kernel: initialize broadcast hrtimer based clock event device
> > Details: https://kernelci.org/boot/id/5dcf3f0359b514dc84cf54c8
> > Plain log: https://storage.kernelci.org//rmk/for-next/v5.4-rc5-26-gb6c3c42cfda0/arm/oxnas_v6_defconfig/gcc-8/lab-baylibre/boot-ox820-cloudengines-pogoplug-series-3.txt
> > HTML log: https://storage.kernelci.org//rmk/for-next/v5.4-rc5-26-gb6c3c42cfda0/arm/oxnas_v6_defconfig/gcc-8/lab-baylibre/boot-ox820-cloudengines-pogoplug-series-3.html
> > Result: ea70bf6e92c5 ARM: 8935/1: decompressor: avoid CP15 barrier instructions in v7 cache setup code
> >
>
> OK, so this regression is caused by the fact that the 'armv7' cache
> maintenance routines in the decompressor are also used for ARMv6 cores
> if they implement the CPUID extension, which I failed to realise when
> I sent this patch.
>
> There are roughly three ways to deal with this:
> 1) add a mask/val match pair for ARM11MPcore and ARM1176 that hardwire
> them to the ARMv6 routines, even though they implement the CPUID
> extension. This would be very easy, but assumes that those two cores
> are the only ones that are affected by this.
> 2) modify the v7 routines to check for the L1Hvd MMFR1 attribute (in
> the flush routine) and for the CP15BEN SCTLR bit (in the on/off
> routines), and jump to the respective v6 variants if the CPU turns out
> not to support the v7 one.
> 3) revert the patch, and just enable the CP15 barriers (and issue a v7
> barrier) in the v7 on() and flush() routines.
>
> I am leaning towards the latter, since it is the most straightforward,
> even though it mixes v7 and cp15 barriers in the same function, but
> that was mostly a cosmetic concern anyway.
I'm going to drop the patches - if -rc8 is released tomorrow maybe we
can have a go at solving it next week.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-16 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-16 5:54 rmk/for-next bisection: boot on ox820-cloudengines-pogoplug-series-3 kernelci.org bot
2019-11-16 10:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-11-16 10:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-11-16 15:35 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-11-16 12:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-16 15:35 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191116104932.GT25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bot@kernelci.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
--cc=guillaume.tucker@collabora.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.hart@linaro.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mgalka@collabora.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).