From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F164C432C0 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7057E222D1 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="q1gAoMw8"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="tmFnzR8K" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7057E222D1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=aSFVmm/exJxuWdjOtXI6clMPo8frEED+f2TI2UTjkFM=; b=q1gAoMw83xhx/k MsuEEuSUttEYJPVN9Rg6HqYo4pe1TwOzJmzwkecLpKZBGefLzd9s4ZdsQuRTWyZ9gbZwUi4qKysba cxPydOsG9EAkoRGe/XjfcEKdeVImXpR0/nEL1GP0U49M4epusLnmEjycOzfBNVFGk2zoROseJFvyQ Zw702gnwum47vzhhdw86/hwYEfa/A9ztwtMbJwrN3xDsAcPX6DqYMcCfHzsF9/L60myZPhXr+hMVT Tjz2jr3Nx3XwZ/3ArydC02tFXB8pvka2hrjtGFhyn0eEmzpR+mm+EcOIGbIp2zC4Kou2fUSIRnUYy QlfBGO/0sUFg8qi3P5Aw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iX4kv-0001WB-4F; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:45:25 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::242]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iX4ks-0001VP-Pe for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:45:24 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-x242.google.com with SMTP id t5so23658379ljk.0 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:45:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XQaroAqPBTv3cn0AH8FgZ1yA4zFjMEz2UzMs9ENgnOY=; b=tmFnzR8KAYYT2cz8AM2wpk1wEy0sDjU3EzQf4HEBut+VQLxsepLk3/6/8cpc0VKxLq UfBrdhDT0xWQNkjBUnKRlzyypOt/BY5REJAP9S/LmH6jD8CWEHzFu3yh/QI7rrH9c82e iOt7YT8gMCBns69s891at8X4YmHIMz2VpY9I1lQAe/X3WWXGwq823m2aLhnBu4X3O85I WByjYcsMltQgesQBh6DEP72LIobgzQSZGowIUlSYGAJVCNg2J146FEQgsxz9eta1yCFC CTo26Eu8TPrW1IcY/Qsml+CosSfQYjV/nsh+d789DkAOExNjaGSuq32wAlu8OnexIfOF 2V5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XQaroAqPBTv3cn0AH8FgZ1yA4zFjMEz2UzMs9ENgnOY=; b=uETV0oS3XREZkUhEBJkTIACy+4RH8blHRPjq+jc3NUEn9uZXDppzeRfF79HwQpZtaa HPEDcFOZ7rluWT+avj+rMEyoeBRiMK3UB/7oDhyLF3Ea7ByRp8RU+Wudk1sbchd1nAyq yKJfmYZiwyWf0NVmQ2uQPATcixvVpcQiSdz/vCFgmX4J5VY62srjOJsL/gEL+8KcmZl0 jHPbGEgj3HiBM8igSVzJ5gH7wZgk0mU7UcLnbj87NfFjaVKhC2U9FQ9rQUo13LX7Ar2Z iFVJeRsXpyzkx/JyUGK0pR6/dQHaVlth18Xxy1bF7vBeRJzC5UsljdMSiUoNgOgKYNUY 0ptQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVYNrTlKvJFgh+LzJfJaJhxsMbdxiJ6b4oF4TFXJZhWo5pXuXvK 1ulKgmiqpcSzTx6uL1AE6YNZlg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy0eb5ynSNYwUa8gfy7iZEtLluEz02LdKIzvGkrxBilNLqPeX629CLSfKICOpAV0jkH6KffEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:974a:: with SMTP id f10mr1615866ljj.25.1574174720904; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:45:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from centauri.ideon.se ([85.235.10.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z20sm11772338ljj.85.2019.11.19.06.45.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:45:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:45:18 +0100 From: Niklas Cassel To: Stanimir Varbanov Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: defconfig: enable CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUFREQ_NVMEM Message-ID: <20191119144518.GA17086@centauri.ideon.se> References: <20191115121544.2339036-1-niklas.cassel@linaro.org> <20191115121544.2339036-6-niklas.cassel@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191119_064522_856926_11144AE0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.53 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, Catalin Marinas , sboyd@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amit.kucheria@linaro.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, vireshk@kernel.org, Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 02:44:03PM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > Hi Niklas, > > On 11/15/19 2:15 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote: > > Enable CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUFREQ_NVMEM. > > Shouldn't this be selected from qcom-cpr.c Kconfig ? Hello Stan, I can see where this is coming from. If e.g. CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUFREQ_NVMEM is selected but CONFIG_QCOM_CPR is not, then the cpufreq driver will return -EPROBE_DEFER, and will never probe successfully. However, I don't really see a difference to any other driver using a framework that the user has not enabled. The driver will then use that framework's stubs, which usually only return -ENODEV or similar. So even though these both need to be enabled to work as intended, they can be compiled/build tested separately. Kind regards, Niklas > > > > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel > > --- > > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > > index 4385033c0a34..09aaffd473a0 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ=m > > CONFIG_ARM_ARMADA_37XX_CPUFREQ=y > > CONFIG_ARM_SCPI_CPUFREQ=y > > CONFIG_ARM_IMX_CPUFREQ_DT=m > > +CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUFREQ_NVMEM=y > > CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUFREQ_HW=y > > CONFIG_ARM_RASPBERRYPI_CPUFREQ=m > > CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA186_CPUFREQ=y > > > > -- > regards, > Stan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel