From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/22] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:42:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191120164236.29359-12-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191120164236.29359-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Rather than directly choosing which function to use based on
psci_ops.conduit, use the new arm_smccc_1_1 wrapper instead.
In some cases we still need to do some operations based on the
conduit, but the code duplication is removed.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c | 13 +++---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 81 ++++++++++++----------------------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
index 54d87506d3b5..7c90b4c615a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
@@ -74,12 +74,13 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A72: {
struct arm_smccc_res res;
+ arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+ if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
+ return;
+
switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
- break;
per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_hvc_switch_mm;
@@ -87,10 +88,6 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
break;
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
- break;
per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_smc_switch_mm;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index 9c0b011eee20..401246e095e7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -209,40 +209,31 @@ static int detect_harden_bp_fw(void)
struct arm_smccc_res res;
u32 midr = read_cpuid_id();
+ arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+
+ switch ((int)res.a0) {
+ case 1:
+ /* Firmware says we're just fine */
+ return 0;
+ case 0:
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -1;
+ }
+
switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- switch ((int)res.a0) {
- case 1:
- /* Firmware says we're just fine */
- return 0;
- case 0:
- cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
- /* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
- smccc_start = NULL;
- smccc_end = NULL;
- break;
- default:
- return -1;
- }
+ cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
+ /* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
+ smccc_start = NULL;
+ smccc_end = NULL;
break;
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- switch ((int)res.a0) {
- case 1:
- /* Firmware says we're just fine */
- return 0;
- case 0:
- cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
- smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
- smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
- break;
- default:
- return -1;
- }
+ cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
+ smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
+ smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
break;
default:
@@ -332,6 +323,8 @@ void __init arm64_enable_wa2_handling(struct alt_instr *alt,
void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
{
+ int conduit;
+
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)) {
pr_info_once("SSBD disabled by kernel configuration\n");
return;
@@ -345,19 +338,10 @@ void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
return;
}
- switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
- break;
-
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
- break;
+ conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state,
+ NULL);
- default:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- break;
- }
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE);
}
static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
@@ -367,6 +351,7 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
bool required = true;
s32 val;
bool this_cpu_safe = false;
+ int conduit;
WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible());
@@ -384,18 +369,10 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
goto out_printmsg;
}
- switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- break;
+ conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- break;
-
- default:
+ if (conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE) {
ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN;
if (!this_cpu_safe)
__ssb_safe = false;
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-20 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-20 16:42 [GIT PULL] KVM/arm updates for 5.5 Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: arm/arm64: Allow reporting non-ISV data aborts to userspace Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm/arm64: Allow user injection of external data aborts Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: arm64: Document PV-time interface Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: arm/arm64: Factor out hypercall handling from PSCI code Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: Implement PV_TIME_FEATURES call Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: Implement kvm_put_guest() Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: arm64: Support stolen time reporting via shared structure Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: Allow kvm_device_ops to be const Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: arm64: Provide VCPU attributes for stolen time Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 10/22] arm/arm64: Provide a wrapper for SMCCC 1.1 calls Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 12/22] arm64: Retrieve stolen time as paravirtualized guest Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Select TASK_DELAY_ACCT+TASKSTATS rather than SCHEDSTATS Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: arm/arm64: Show halt poll counters in debugfs Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: arm64: Don't set HCR_EL2.TVM when S2FWB is supported Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: arm64: vgic-v4: Move the GICv4 residency flow to be driven by vcpu_load/put Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Remove the declaration of kvm_send_userspace_msi() Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Fix some comments typo Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Don't rely on the wrong pending table Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: arm/arm64: Let the timer expire in hardirq context on RT Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: vgic-v4: Track the number of VLPIs per vcpu Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 22/22] KVM: arm64: Opportunistically turn off WFI trapping when using direct LPI injection Marc Zyngier
2019-11-21 8:58 ` [GIT PULL] KVM/arm updates for 5.5 Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-21 9:06 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191120164236.29359-12-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).