From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A706FC43603 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 15:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73537206DB for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 15:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="rzGfS+DQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 73537206DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=0DRrf33H/GpvfmPF0qpaBEWT2qKxYZDjY6SGUt+UGCw=; b=rzGfS+DQMhpxNC PZHlSVy9bi4KAlKwbbmJOU9qYjV7ZrnvVm4pI+hQ0JmnM99g6wUsKwGoK2eeyFUstcJQJEnjPMHF7 vBaXcRiJIqgON0JMy7pHaJcZodSN95XQg+RMtBY4ruKkKD7khj2wKAPtp/QzeuqTWYt7tFnqf6RT6 L82oCLeoJyK1rnahg18rOyKUBkoMGzpinM0dS3VGh7XkLNgQGAZ6Xv0dM9VY4+T9nRLRC20mdEtSu 4zd4xXh8lNctfRzNX0BaqqrulScCZZh7Hu78hk+KJUcDW0g9PEN2a6eYa99ClbkpU6K5eayMzUZjg ZELIbyvIRHSYBH5Z1SXg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ictNJ-0001mh-Ld; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 15:49:05 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ictNF-0001m6-Ir for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 15:49:03 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1480F1FB; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 07:49:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE6E13F52E; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 07:48:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 15:48:56 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: John Garry Subject: Re: PSCI checker query Message-ID: <20191205154856.GC20398@bogus> References: <5c3c69bf-cae9-8ad5-9da2-c0af7a5932e7@huawei.com> <20191205133020.GA20398@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191205_074901_666301_FA8FA11F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Linuxarm , "Huangming \(Mark\)" , wanghuiqiang , Sudeep Holla , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi john, On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 02:22:01PM +0000, John Garry wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > > Both use the same firmware(or at-least the baseline) ? > > Well from the kernel logs provided we have for D05: > psci: PSCIv1.0 detected in firmware. > > and for the D06 board: > psci: PSCIv1.1 detected in firmware. > > Both seem to be using v1.4 ATF also from the bios logs (they don't tell much > else). > Good, it's standard TF-A project. You should be able to run some TF-tests easily then. > Are there any > > significant hardware or firmware changes around CPU power-off sequence ? > > Not that I know about specifically. I've cc'ed some of our firmware guys, > who may know more details. > OK > > If you are running same kernel image on both, firmware becomes easy > > target to start with. > > Yes, same kernel build. That's v5.4 with some unrelated changes. > > Have you run some tests on PSCI firmware ? > > Again, I'll have to refer to our firmware guys. BTW, I'll say now that this > D05 board is legacy... > Just for your information, I am referring to these tests in TF-A [1] I don't have must details myself as I tried them long back, but I just had to refer to the user guide [2] back then. -- Regards, Sudeep [1] https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/tf-a-tests.git [2] https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/tf-a-tests.git/about/docs/user-guide.rst _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel