From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CDAC2D0C7 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97B2E2053B for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="VWlKffVy"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="aGoM1Sg4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 97B2E2053B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RF568B6tPh0dQJ/5kK4GqJdq4Mu/5q+HKemea9Ae6dY=; b=VWlKffVyHW2NlZ ze7a/E2cP7xi6hTdqQ5x0nOJ1zMJ7p1o2wp0mKvesko3VIGo3A/OwSIRahfcC3i1GKtsUWsTpD0PM ZJhglNTxOIesqFe+rrc0brcBfcDmzdly4Fp5BJFFpFATuZVjJoUx4lsXZhLEXMHsnyrFETs9Au9+R X0Uj2G8tM80S1bx/JP979+wqX2RK56OXLDJXj0VwgJ6B7x2+wiE80n6yoRmAU5IWW6UItMCONKM1q xpjaVkPTImIxcTqjEkBhySHswH5KuXBjtUsvDbLlRUZvK+fgY72bbhKh7h0mdyr+CHNVpV0Jpk54B lW1yy4joYgC4Hz7//4sA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iecbe-0000Uz-6s; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:19:02 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iecba-0000Tt-MA for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:18:59 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id x8so8681526pgk.8 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 02:18:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MjJMrLdfpPJ4Sc3kZhH/VjXjH5+SHZoVHKv3pR43FLk=; b=aGoM1Sg4g9adkhnRSZkca8ipBYqH5zDXO6Sn8dVvkuMuBaD0+kTFKL8siM4sm9zEp7 lGLuxvo/M9CNikbqj3KnIxLENsqlMB9CZ8PPWH5BrjONlfLYN1Pc3R5CDMeM0B96mIst p1VtxX7v/OfIUeBmMI+Wkm0Qnpv7Wmi0KqEBGkU9Won8QYiXe83qsocnN3L0z2o3lFyP 8ftiMcAZXD8h9ZQkzg/OQiOYqfFuSPDH8PynDld/iot3oJPCg4ol6S+rLBR87MDV1PJB xCVbzdQ8FISzsF9bgU3shE4ipMBny5JTBWws2h6l2pV7y7EHlhjtTatKLqNIupIwgRnI JcaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MjJMrLdfpPJ4Sc3kZhH/VjXjH5+SHZoVHKv3pR43FLk=; b=ET7sZ+fPZusqe5DFTbkiIZI5v45MVaognRuX+JfV5G0sbzzrDMwr95D22N9EmKHtAe 7XKEE3nTsKCcvaVYyzA0pEhVDuIgFbOXYClZMs8T6dKnhhs+TIjqj/IFOd45dcY67rYi P65BZEvM7HwsQEaW1hXTK/DQl52iUs8MDa4G+fYZ/n493+BUjY+Dnp5cf86BNzdAU3Gk pWR/aYDEQtTzB7gM/G2rXvxCv4L6CYX4H3xmOA/taZMpikTe7YYzL+Y553SBdma1uN3P X4saP4tp6dqvpqA1oFEFGSI5F2K3ok7bAkVzVy5N+2W86rrWgY6SaJd8fjIisl78TdXx 5+AA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWTnh2b30EXfWeW235vlNt8CTtDAc6OigmksZ8K45zpCSg3f9Qr ZSV1LcuC4CWIwfcdZslyeX2Ctg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyHPhqMG4TPXyS2uSioe8CvqmwehPnF4vkNuYU85Y8GyvvVGdr/eAXk14Erkx4+waKABZllQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e648:: with SMTP id p8mr23578874pgj.259.1575973134356; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 02:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([122.171.112.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p16sm2723690pgm.8.2019.12.10.02.18.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 02:18:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:48:51 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of transport type Message-ID: <20191210101851.gpayo7bnyf54opyu@vireshk-i7> References: <5c545c2866ba075ddb44907940a1dae1d823b8a1.1575019719.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20191203120002.GB4171@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191203120002.GB4171@bogus> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191210_021858_723043_0D6AF0CA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.40 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jassi Brar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 03-12-19, 12:00, Sudeep Holla wrote: > I am more interested in this part. As I am aware the only 2 other > transport being discussed is SMC/HVC and new/yet conceptual SPCI(built > on top of SMC/HVC). There are already discussions on the list to make > former as mailbox[1]. While I see both pros and cons with that approach, > there's a need to converge. One main advantage I see with SMC/HVC mailbox > is that it can be used with any other client and not just SCMI. Equally, > the queuing in the mailbox may not be needed with fast SMC/HVC but may > be needed for new SPCI(not yet fully analysed). We were also looking for OPTEE based mailbox which is similar to SPCI. -- viresh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel