From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AA8C2D0CB for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C69724671 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Qj5Qdy06"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kjb8SO0l" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8C69724671 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=yK9Z3Ne8PZScGLgrYeadwrNWpUR1zjxYwoUqdVE70l0=; b=Qj5Qdy06DB1FzN xg8Plxg7/MpMfS9W4UQKYvPhCbirSoX21F5AdoJ+5KRjEAQSx87ej1uiRNW9GX2/KDgrcWB2ljSKk 1SY8JYmM84C9hv/7Ddbuirm3pxBbxDAM4yA3TRZACsmSBJamKci9a+PcOE53OshVSWGIZQNfILZp/ f1r40OhbnrK5cRBP/jfGIg05W6atuBGLQyu4ecMyNS/qHKtj8eOgKkyn8mq7j8dIwXOWV8hbYNIMx qRGwzaoKFLPt5IywNqZ6HAZ65uZF3lAe+tgJ7xuwVUXqyFjNBWXmOxgeVhB577IaTGs8H0phhNkX/ bCtpAs8DswBEI3oJ5CJw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1igXFF-0005xw-0b; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:59:49 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1igXF0-0005kK-7y for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:59:35 +0000 Received: from wens.tw (mirror2.csie.ntu.edu.tw [140.112.30.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61D1822B48; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:59:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576429169; bh=AggvsG1/GZy0NVHIzr7eHUOA85RmCqX0dOr608p8zzA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kjb8SO0ljbi+aEGO76d4lW2vkCTjPXBcJEiB5YmicJ5tnekR7Bo8nxXTjwOGFKgl0 4FTvCWTEShVqVAs4AIZqM7d7S6IEHs3SOTtLitqhccgYJ4nBWYIy4HwGXcKtZ/x8Vt ZgX9Dv1i4h3TNz0hi9zQMc5zRZ9TZPSWlvMtriio= Received: by wens.tw (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 271EE5FD21; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:59:26 +0800 (CST) From: Chen-Yu Tsai To: Maxime Ripard , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sakari Ailus , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland Subject: [PATCH 02/14] dt-bindings: media: sun4i-csi: Add compatible for CSI0 on R40 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:59:12 +0800 Message-Id: <20191215165924.28314-3-wens@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.0 In-Reply-To: <20191215165924.28314-1-wens@kernel.org> References: <20191215165924.28314-1-wens@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191215_085934_321254_050AA7B9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.98 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Chen-Yu Tsai The CSI0 block in the Allwinner R40 SoC looks to be the same as the one in the A20. The register maps line up, and they support the same features. The R40 appears to support BT.1120 based on the feature overview, but it is not mentioned anywhere else. Also like the A20, the ISP is not mentioned, but the CSI special clock needs to be enabled for the hardware to function. The manual does state that the CSI special clock is the TOP clock for all CSI hardware, but currently no hardware exists for us to test if CSI1 also depends on it or not. Add a compatible string for the CSI0 block in the R40, with the A20 compatible string as a fallback. Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai --- .../devicetree/bindings/media/allwinner,sun4i-a10-csi.yaml | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/allwinner,sun4i-a10-csi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/allwinner,sun4i-a10-csi.yaml index 221fe630c7d5..d486321b13f5 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/allwinner,sun4i-a10-csi.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/allwinner,sun4i-a10-csi.yaml @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ properties: - items: - const: allwinner,sun7i-a20-csi1 - const: allwinner,sun4i-a10-csi1 + - items: + - const: allwinner,sun8i-r40-csi0 + - const: allwinner,sun7i-a20-csi0 reg: maxItems: 1 -- 2.24.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel