From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C865DC2D0C0 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F481222C2 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="b92QBTA2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9F481222C2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=g4eVx6aNo89ntxO6c9Cm0haAmVwG3C/ppNI62/W4/pQ=; b=b92QBTA220GsjU BIKtq61nei69OQp0siW1fsHHnJinPb1CqbRNzigT3H9hbr//e6WI7fVD5Z1zTy0h3Wjcqar6aKFoj mRQ9rebH8h4N6uehaHMqgrFD2IQLAzX1kBAH4ehuTbXMo6ghpUxRWQkyhEzKkPXs3DcokjG1qI/ab Oci/XbCh7R2EYIgKla9p3nK/XAaOZbnIGBNRUq32HQOD7W1eJvOaBLznxOWtMTbVOsj5hPmu4o0xs cHu0JFP3kDUGyZt4spzuBrqV+mQ1eGkGYGwHF1L6keOL/jPn8sEaFnZYw3pHWr+iktTvPgg8svnJz gdxtQmE2oite/S561SYA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ihwst-0005EW-1k; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:34:35 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ihwsq-0005Dq-3g for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:34:33 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7907931B; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 06:34:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E8A83F6CF; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 06:34:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:34:27 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/14] cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd Message-ID: <20191219143427.GF20746@bogus> References: <20191211154343.29765-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20191211154343.29765-14-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191211154343.29765-14-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191219_063432_245177_73699561 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.77 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Lezcano , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Andy Gross , Lina Iyer , Bjorn Andersson , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Sudeep Holla , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 04:43:42PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > When the hierarchical CPU topology layout is used in DT and the PSCI OSI > mode is supported by the PSCI FW, let's initialize a corresponding PM > domain topology by using genpd. This enables a CPU and a group of CPUs, > when attached to the topology, to be power-managed accordingly. > > To trigger the attempt to initialize the genpd data structures let's use a > subsys_initcall, which should be early enough to allow CPUs, but also other > devices to be attached. > > The initialization consists of parsing the PSCI OF node for the topology > and the "domain idle states" DT bindings. In case the idle states are > compatible with "domain-idle-state", the initialized genpd becomes > responsible of selecting an idle state for the PM domain, via assigning it > a genpd governor. > > Note that, a successful initialization of the genpd data structures, is > followed by a call to psci_set_osi_mode(), as to try to enable the OSI mode > in the PSCI FW. In case this fails, we fall back into a degraded mode > rather than bailing out and returning an error code. > > Co-developed-by: Lina Iyer > Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson > --- > > Changes in v4: > - None. > > --- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c | 267 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 4 +- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h | 5 + > 3 files changed, 274 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c > index 656ef3d59149..c2f94ba42222 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c > @@ -7,14 +7,281 @@ > * > */ > > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "CPUidle PSCI: " fmt > + > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > +#include > +#include > +#include > > #include "cpuidle-psci.h" > > +struct psci_pd_provider { > + struct list_head link; > + struct device_node *node; > +}; > + > +static LIST_HEAD(psci_pd_providers); > +static bool osi_mode_enabled; > + > +static int psci_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *pd) > +{ > + struct genpd_power_state *state = &pd->states[pd->state_idx]; > + u32 *pd_state; > + > + /* If we have failed to enable OSI mode, then abort power off. */ > + if (!osi_mode_enabled) > + return -EBUSY; > + Why is above check needed ? Shouldn't we have disable/remove pd of OSI is not enabled ? > + if (!state->data) > + return 0; > + > + /* OSI mode is enabled, set the corresponding domain state. */ > + pd_state = state->data; > + psci_set_domain_state(*pd_state); > + > + return 0; > +} > + [...] > +static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = { > + { .compatible = "arm,psci" }, I think we can drop the above one as it's for v0.1 which didn't support OSI. > + { .compatible = "arm,psci-0.2" }, > + { .compatible = "arm,psci-1.0" }, > + {} > +}; > + > +static int __init psci_idle_init_domains(void) > +{ > + struct device_node *np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, psci_of_match); > + struct device_node *node; > + int ret = 0, pd_count = 0; > + > + if (!np) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + /* Currently limit the hierarchical topology to be used in OSI mode. */ > + if (!psci_has_osi_support()) > + goto out; > + > + /* > + * Parse child nodes for the "#power-domain-cells" property and > + * initialize a genpd/genpd-of-provider pair when it's found. > + */ > + for_each_child_of_node(np, node) { > + if (!of_find_property(node, "#power-domain-cells", NULL)) > + continue; > + > + ret = psci_pd_init(node); > + if (ret) > + goto put_node; > + > + pd_count++; > + } > + > + /* Bail out if not using the hierarchical CPU topology. */ > + if (!pd_count) > + goto out; > + > + /* Link genpd masters/subdomains to model the CPU topology. */ > + ret = psci_pd_init_topology(np); > + if (ret) > + goto remove_pd; > + > + /* Try to enable OSI mode. */ > + ret = psci_set_osi_mode(); > + if (ret) > + pr_warn("failed to enable OSI mode: %d\n", ret); Same question as above: shouldn't we disable and goto remove_pd ? -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel