linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: alexandre.torgue@st.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: stm32-dfsdm: Use dma_request_chan() instead dma_request_slave_channel()
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 15:45:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191223154538.74a76f94@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191217075221.23895-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:52:21 +0200
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> wrote:

> dma_request_slave_channel() is a wrapper on top of dma_request_chan()
> eating up the error code.
> 
> By using dma_request_chan() directly the driver can support deferred
> probing against DMA.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
I don't think this one goes far enough.  

One of the paths does:

	/* Optionally request DMA */
	if (stm32_dfsdm_dma_request(indio_dev)) {
		dev_dbg(&indio_dev->dev, "No DMA support\n");
		return 0;
	}

That needs specific handling for deferred probing.

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> index e493242c266e..3aac1a21f9d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> @@ -1383,9 +1383,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_dma_request(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  {
>  	struct stm32_dfsdm_adc *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
> -	adc->dma_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(&indio_dev->dev, "rx");
> -	if (!adc->dma_chan)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	adc->dma_chan = dma_request_chan(&indio_dev->dev, "rx");
> +	if (IS_ERR(adc->dma_chan))
> +		return PTR_ERR(adc->dma_chan);
>  
>  	adc->rx_buf = dma_alloc_coherent(adc->dma_chan->device->dev,
>  					 DFSDM_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE,


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-23 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-17  7:52 [PATCH] iio: adc: stm32-dfsdm: Use dma_request_chan() instead dma_request_slave_channel() Peter Ujfalusi
2019-12-23 15:45 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2019-12-23 22:00   ` Peter Ujfalusi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191223154538.74a76f94@archlinux \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).