From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEADC2D0C2 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 19:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B37F217F4 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 19:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="odE2Mq/M" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6B37F217F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=atomide.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=kiMzP9nCBjDJaG2tLGg6mX5EVDSSTBpFIi/kpncuZwk=; b=odE2Mq/MJoJ+HJ hBdNTw/yr+1STdIXVsHdXdln9nXCzWGj5aa7ISe17UAiHg+382zgj7QXjk8HR2pMrlUzvRB+Qv2bd 6dHOzYFA20ySbkr4Dpu2k5rhnvndwn7J8EWBiigZnPiJeeE9HBmSbqTEZU4sgHtyAxWoGS/qOWPl9 Hlk/KkKQpBigfYcJ63ZKwxAx2QoOAc9fAjlJFwLibVLeVFVvzR4nvBauvZJvyQ+qHZqso6D0+1VyD yoPklngBKiSERahhNVocQ8iMJMPsgLCRr7XejsgDf/NTNFdXOPD9MjqzsYs36nAGsrNtBNp1pMqx8 cXTT1Vk1Q2a5YQtRFSfw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1in66O-0002ja-Jd; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 19:25:48 +0000 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1in66M-0002il-DC for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 19:25:47 +0000 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E003F8087; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 19:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:25:40 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Droid 4 regression in 5.5-rc1, armsoc-soc tree Message-ID: <20200102192540.GD16702@atomide.com> References: <20191228162929.GA29269@duo.ucw.cz> <20191228193622.GA13047@duo.ucw.cz> <20191230173507.GM35479@atomide.com> <20200102110025.GA29035@amd> <20200102140609.7vsfwcjyvbbrmcjx@ucw.cz> <20200102171140.GB16702@atomide.com> <20200102191804.nhnpd7q2eh4ul5a5@ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200102191804.nhnpd7q2eh4ul5a5@ucw.cz> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200102_112546_486076_68BB134F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Marcel Partap , Arnd Bergmann , merlijn@wizzup.org, martin_rysavy@centrum.cz, Sebastian Reichel , kernel list , nekit1000@gmail.com, Olof Johansson , linux-omap , linux-arm-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org * Pavel Machek [200102 19:18]: > > * Arnd Bergmann [200102 14:48]: > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:06 PM Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > > # good: [ab818f0999dc73af3f966194d087e9f6650f939f] Merge tag > > > > # 'omap-for-v5.5/maintainers-signed' of > > > > # git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap into > > > > # arm/soc > > > > git bisect good ab818f0999dc73af3f966194d087e9f6650f939f > > > > # first bad commit: [38206c24ab09b4f4c2a57de5c1af0bb2e69cf5b6] Merge tag > > > > # 'armsoc-soc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc > > > > > > > > ...and am not sure how to interpret the result, or what to do next :(. > > > > > > This means that either the bisection is unreliable (it might be 100% > > > reproducible or you mixed up good/bad once), or that the arm-soc > > > branch was indeed good by itself but had a conflict with some other > > > change that torvalds merged earlier. > > > > > > I would suggest to go back to the list I had extracted in my previous > > > email and revert all the commits that I identify there, on top of > > > linux-5.5-rc4. If some commit is not easily reverted, skip that one > > > at first. > > > > > > Ideally this gets you a working kernel based on -rc4, and then > > > you can bisect that to find which revert fixed it. > > > > Also please check your dtb is up to date. We still have a lot of > > stuff missing from the device tree meaning an old dtb will likely > > be incomplete for many devices. > > Aha, so it works ok when using matching kernel + dtb. OK good to hear. > Is 5.5 kernel with 5.3 dtb situation worth debugging? Well producing a warning based on something would be good. Not sure what the logic would be though, checking for some minimum dtb version required would have to be bumped until we have complete dts data. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel