linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of transport type
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:00:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200106110007.GA54466@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABb+yY0qh-qWJWxEaB9_XxmiFb=xP0hOxpm1j54seeT3dMKt2w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 02:09:27PM -0600, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:32 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > The SCMI specification is fairly independent of the transport protocol,
> > which can be a simple mailbox (already implemented) or anything else.
> > The current Linux implementation however is very much dependent of the
> > mailbox transport layer.
> >
> > This patch makes the SCMI core code (driver.c) independent of the
> > mailbox transport layer and moves all mailbox related code to a new
> > file: mailbox.c.
> >
> > We can now implement more transport protocols to transport SCMI
> > messages.
> >
> > The transport protocols just need to provide struct scmi_transport_ops,
> > with its version of the callbacks to enable exchange of SCMI messages.
> >
> We can either add new transport layer between SCMI and Mailbox layers,
> or we can write new transport as a mailbox driver (which I always
> thought could be a usecase). Right now I am of no strong opinion
> either way.  Depends, what other transport do you have in mind?
>

To be more clear, this patch abstracts the SCMI transport so that mailbox
can be one of the transport. The plan is to add SMC/HVC, SMC/HVC over SPCI,
vitio based transport as alternative to mailbox. These are neither added
as mailbox driver nor transport layer between SCMI and Mailbox. E.g.:
we either use Peng's SMC based mailbox driver as is or add a new transport
independent of mailbox framework here as SCMI transport.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-06 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-29  9:31 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of transport type Viresh Kumar
2019-12-03 12:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-10 10:18   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-12-09 18:13 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-12-10  5:34   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-12-10 18:46     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-11  2:43       ` Viresh Kumar
2019-12-31  2:50 ` Peng Fan
2019-12-31 12:22   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-31 20:09 ` Jassi Brar
2020-01-06 11:00   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-01-09  8:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-09  9:16   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-10 12:22     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-09  9:34   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-09 10:15     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-10 12:27     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-13  6:45       ` Peng Fan
2020-01-10 12:31     ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200106110007.GA54466@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).