From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com
Cc: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, airlied@linux.ie,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
boris.brezillon@bootlin.com, lee.jones@linaro.org,
peda@axentia.se, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] drm: atmel-hlcdc: prefer a lower pixel-clock than requested
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 20:02:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200106190234.GA15881@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f8603b2-9ae6-97bf-73c0-1b204595dce1@microchip.com>
Hi Claudiu.
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:25:40AM +0000, Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com wrote:
>
>
> On 04.01.2020 19:12, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > Hi Claudiu
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:08:48AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:28:28PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> >>> From: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> >>>
> >>> The intention was to only select a higher pixel-clock rate than the
> >>> requested, if a slight overclocking would result in a rate significantly
> >>> closer to the requested rate than if the conservative lower pixel-clock
> >>> rate is selected. The fixed patch has the logic the other way around and
> >>> actually prefers the higher frequency. Fix that.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: f6f7ad323461 ("drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock than requested")
> >> The id is wrong here - the right one is: 9946a3a9dbedaaacef8b7e94f6ac144f1daaf1de
> >> The wrong id above was used before - so I think it is a copy'n'paste
> >> thing.
> >>
> >> Hint: try "dim fixes 9946a3a9dbedaaacef8b7e94f6ac144f1daaf1de"
> >>
> >> If I get a quick response from Lee I can fix it up while applying.
> >>
> >> Sam
> >>
> >>> Reported-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> >>> Tested-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> >
> > One other detail.
> > The patch has passed through your hands, so you have to add your s-o-b
> > to document this.
> > The chain of s-o-b shall document the path the patch has taken towards
> > the kernel.
> >
> > In this case:
> > Peter => Claudiu => Sam => Applied.
> >
> > Please resend or reply where you say OK that I add your s-o-b.
>
> Sure! Please add my Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Thanks - all four DRM patches pushed to drm-misc-next.
I used "dim fixes" so we could Cc relevant stable versions.
Sam
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-06 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-18 12:28 [PATCH v3 0/6] fixes for atmel-hlcdc Claudiu Beznea
2019-12-18 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] drm: atmel-hlcdc: use double rate for pixel clock only if supported Claudiu Beznea
2019-12-18 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drm: atmel-hlcdc: enable clock before configuring timing engine Claudiu Beznea
2019-12-18 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] mfd: atmel-hlcdc: add struct device member to struct atmel_hlcdc_regmap Claudiu Beznea
2019-12-18 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] mfd: atmel-hlcdc: return in case of error Claudiu Beznea
2020-01-07 10:18 ` Lee Jones
2019-12-18 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drm: atmel-hlcdc: prefer a lower pixel-clock than requested Claudiu Beznea
2020-01-02 9:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-01-04 17:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-01-06 9:25 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-01-06 19:02 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2020-01-06 9:24 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-01-07 9:19 ` Peter Rosin
2019-12-18 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Revert "drm: atmel-hlcdc: enable sys_clk during initalization." Claudiu Beznea
2020-01-02 9:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] fixes for atmel-hlcdc Sam Ravnborg
2020-01-02 16:05 ` Lee Jones
2020-01-02 16:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-01-06 19:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-01-07 10:17 ` [GIT PULL] Immutable branch between MFD and DRM due for the v5.6 merge window Lee Jones
2020-01-07 18:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200106190234.GA15881@ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).