From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2044DC33CAF for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9ED62072B for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="IKPsfKxd" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E9ED62072B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RAfVOGRsAbcNhgQiwVKSF7z2bC4kdqmw8fBobODSJNM=; b=IKPsfKxdPjUubZ WcSEYt6Neia+Z+PeVCkMBUGLLIWZIol2LdWEvDwZC5hoZ2ejRZodcvn0anwCSTP9j4xoopOKSWXF1 bJO1bLzmhHnPZa3Yc9WzII0/a1cKu6EGV6kcCDXRI8F+wCoK0bb1YONSpl2VUOnjT8godEvSPwxmc DQxNVUhorOfZ7hbRqtks5g9s0IQlXPjy4iqkkZ1u61hQ1wQJQ3G+Z2Y92A8Fam/4ayIASc91WsPQ5 WwiK1ypBT587ZbiyA7nFIvZXCv8i2WY2IloKgObfWs+JkQ3M5j7+rKXjcTPJ1EpBkoZdyLLmwq3Di DNNMAdPFLZ7jDaPp58GA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1isBD9-0003H9-8Q; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:53:47 +0000 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1isBD5-0003Gl-Ft for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:53:45 +0000 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A06B1E5; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:53:33 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Call out example SYM_FUNC_* usage as x86-specific Message-ID: <20200116125333.5de68e48@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20200115184305.1187-1-will@kernel.org> References: <20200115184305.1187-1-will@kernel.org> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200116_115343_542017_451DE73A X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.79 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Jiri Slaby , kernel-team@android.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:43:05 +0000 Will Deacon wrote: > The example given in asm-annotations.rst to describe the constraints that > a function should meet in order to be annotated with a SYM_FUNC_* macro > is x86-specific, and not necessarily applicable to architectures using > branch-and-link style calling conventions such as arm64. > > Tweak the example text to call out the x86-specific text. > > Cc: Mark Brown > Cc: Jiri Slaby > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon > --- Makes sense to me, applied, thanks. jon _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel