From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: peng.fan@nxp.com, arnd@arndb.de, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peter.hilber@opensynergy.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
cristian.marussi@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of the transport type
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:15:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200122121538.GA31240@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9ec58818b5e0c982810e74efe3f5f22b930ae40.1579660436.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 08:06:23AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The SCMI specification is fairly independent of the transport protocol,
> which can be a simple mailbox (already implemented) or anything else.
> The current Linux implementation however is very much dependent on the
> mailbox transport layer.
>
> This patch makes the SCMI core code (driver.c) independent of the
> mailbox transport layer and moves all mailbox related code to a new
> file: mailbox.c.
>
> We can now implement more transport protocols to transport SCMI
> messages.
>
> The transport protocols just need to provide struct scmi_transport_ops,
> with its version of the callbacks to enable exchange of SCMI messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> @Sudeep: It was my mistake that I didn't check if there is something
> already queued for next release and you never told me as well earlier :)
>
No I didn't want to distract the discussion with that silly thing.
> Can you please help me getting this tested, now that I have rebased it
> as well :) ?
>
Sure, I will give it a go on my Juno. Thanks for the rebase, makes it
simpler.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-22 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-21 8:27 [PATCH V3] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of the transport type Viresh Kumar
2020-01-21 15:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-21 18:38 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-22 2:36 ` [PATCH V4] " Viresh Kumar
2020-01-22 12:15 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-01-23 10:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-23 11:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-23 11:37 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-01-23 15:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-24 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-24 11:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-24 12:15 ` Peter Hilber
2020-01-24 18:28 ` Jassi Brar
2020-01-22 12:44 ` [PATCH V3] " Cristian Marussi
2020-01-23 2:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-23 11:06 ` Cristian Marussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200122121538.GA31240@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peter.hilber@opensynergy.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).