From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76041C2D0DB for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485092467F for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Z0te6CC8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 485092467F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=3dXvsK3eXqv3wirQMIPZsVaauvw5DO2ikYXutB8C79s=; b=Z0te6CC8MlAGQm Pf9P/WVVi/CLWe7g3KfhIA9+E1oYddScniPXgtYxIAu7T0vzoGeoZvEVJwI+y0bx5R/iuJokNTZk7 cyPTI3D7yHkUJppAToKoDifXrfyAD1AcOxqonXN+MIYrHHC0WiXSpLAj3tUlkWu1Kzu6WCmR4eDfx zgoCpNQVo0ohQWOCIeAGGrobAG2v+TozkKNNvzg8yz/MDWvJFO2c2O+wjzlfujg69W/Af1J84iGjS Z71Ph630uUwcGqh7lkXahxqTD/67RCiOisFMQ31Vy8cm6646BfUFYYZc+jJfgM0cESWV2vGngGV6M WGenkrD1BEuWDKq53EcQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iuEvH-0007lt-GG; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:15:51 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iuEvE-0007lE-2J for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:15:49 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B90328; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 04:15:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 324543F52E; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 04:15:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:15:38 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of the transport type Message-ID: <20200122121538.GA31240@bogus> References: <20200121183818.GA11522@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200122_041548_155936_1DE36A30 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peng.fan@nxp.com, arnd@arndb.de, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peter.hilber@opensynergy.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sudeep Holla , cristian.marussi@arm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 08:06:23AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The SCMI specification is fairly independent of the transport protocol, > which can be a simple mailbox (already implemented) or anything else. > The current Linux implementation however is very much dependent on the > mailbox transport layer. > > This patch makes the SCMI core code (driver.c) independent of the > mailbox transport layer and moves all mailbox related code to a new > file: mailbox.c. > > We can now implement more transport protocols to transport SCMI > messages. > > The transport protocols just need to provide struct scmi_transport_ops, > with its version of the callbacks to enable exchange of SCMI messages. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- > @Sudeep: It was my mistake that I didn't check if there is something > already queued for next release and you never told me as well earlier :) > No I didn't want to distract the discussion with that silly thing. > Can you please help me getting this tested, now that I have rebased it > as well :) ? > Sure, I will give it a go on my Juno. Thanks for the rebase, makes it simpler. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel