From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1159BC33CAC for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D609D20838 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="BLm8sDRB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D609D20838 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=+/Tj/LGCvoh17N5s03WltLPgRYcjfTJ4dNcsO8UCi3c=; b=BLm8sDRBTvy96k Oe7IhQtyL7g/l/xl+ddtFc3/VLDp/gRPOITbsk/agMP7p6bLWlhEC1Jg9ZCGcaymZNblGN9tB23rv hc+aLPi/jb/2Gt+dClc/63XxT1iw+IBiDNJWWqXidvUQSs7zmm0PHeRguKIDYr2uuOISF+aI2IpKx 1bGKVpDLp2TeVRf56OXypENT2YlyjdKB8t+q0/WUa5Qj4AWEkXYfjEmbwW6HVO4ofmEtaHCH9Rf4Q A6mczr4PqNR+qdbchbsuPrI2U6zI4kN4pce4fHsV856zpSznz9zq5EVDx9JePPBhrCBW4L+XY+Oxm Ld5fGLj6ApgM/pNRjNxA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1izjUz-0003J9-0U; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:55:25 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1izjUv-0003I8-Sy for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:55:23 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D961FB; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 07:55:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A2533F68E; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 07:55:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:55:12 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: peng.fan@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: mailbox: share shmem for protocols Message-ID: <20200206155512.GA55006@bogus> References: <1580993966-17757-1-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1580993966-17757-1-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200206_075521_979581_6883D205 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.75 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, Sudeep Holla , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:59:25PM +0800, peng.fan@nxp.com wrote: > From: Peng Fan > > When shmem property of protocol is not specificed, let it use > its parent's shmem property. I had replied already to the thread without ALKML you had sent earlier, please refer them. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel