From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D14C34050 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D945924656 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="UDcxf/9+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D945924656 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ytLskt86Js5kqIUT4alfGOx/Sr1w5nvrPkJp+QRjheY=; b=UDcxf/9+N/j2fo CV+oltljJfjP61wNkn1hGa9ceit+GR4QUEfT13W7rYqQpECPHkhhtF1AqwSHjo4V9mj3/ERU+aQYR 0j/07/G95t3fFHKBbceax+IR4hH+FqwgN3Jmo1/TXUbL3MKcOkd30rplcZ+bbs8lImYZbJHsVhwZG Hm3g1d/NRgIkZdD7P/FiP69VYpOmfEe3IlbkQRY2qVfjD8gbJb+mtPk25WmQ00YlfKQlEz7ByFFqd rdqh2QUewP86PQdVOFejDpI2YcSvl/Uw+6cbuCgEp7+DwUIfMCMzvWbkXjy+kj79o/UZcxdUBfTZc aemhoYLlg2W4Dew+u4Ug==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j4R7H-00038M-Ei; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:18:23 +0000 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j4R7D-00036h-Uq for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:18:21 +0000 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Feb 2020 07:18:14 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,459,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="235919620" Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.54.74.202]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2020 07:18:14 -0800 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 07:18:14 -0800 From: Sean Christopherson To: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 21/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Use ranged-based TLB flush for dirty log memslot flush Message-ID: <20200219151814.GC15888@linux.intel.com> References: <20200218210736.16432-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20200218210736.16432-22-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200219_071820_461724_04AE4D31 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.94 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , Peter Xu , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Janosch Frank , Marc Zyngier , Joerg Roedel , Christian Borntraeger , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jim Mattson , Cornelia Huck , Christoffer Dall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse , Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:22:58PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello! > > On 19.02.2020 0:07, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > >Use the with_address() variant to when performing a TLB flush for a > ^^ is it really needed here? Doh, thanks. The subject also has a typo, it should be "range-based", not "ranged-based". > >specific memslot via kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(), i.e. when > >flushing after clearing dirty bits during KVM_{GET,CLEAR}_DIRTY_LOG. > >This aligns all dirty log memslot-specific TLB flushes to use the > >with_address() variant and paves the way for consolidating the relevant > >code. > > > >Note, moving to the with_address() variant only affects functionality > >when running as a HyperV guest. > > > >Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov > >Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > [...] > > MBR, Sergei _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel