From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5027C35E01 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAEDE2084E for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="TsagPghQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BAEDE2084E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=J5LZiXk/H3/Ho+dNspEr1SDLjOOJqCqsVokS40yReSw=; b=TsagPghQ8qKPi9 2Sz489rEwELxemjS1yjafg9p7QfK1iDycZKvlY2pFvwqV36oXlEPGfo5VuuWdrIcgxODhcfXC2xBX S7ZFV0jkK5TXs6OJuCy+bUzK1BbHOrC8Nx7rM6f0tmRMqd38OB0n1EIKt29BvYJaCiexlyXK0Pbuk Rqr+/Q8rwzoaIVunlKKfmO7DXbfO/EOEcoqzHU8mTi2B8H7XCGFYD8QMVZv37JNAtVOnaXW5zs5nz NBk+D/KMOylWycXk7v2HIjoI6irviJ+cSbl0yr6umrkbQHL5hEymwpMSKzC5Z7kxpjPRnfxBjfL6p /Zi2pxV17SxgJRCTLSgw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j6eRO-0002n1-6j; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:56:18 +0000 Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j6eRN-0002mp-F9; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:56:17 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:56:17 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: mark ARM OABI as incompatible in Kconfig Message-ID: <20200225175617.GB4129@infradead.org> References: <20200225005553.GD6740@magnolia> <79faa339-d6b8-d8eb-0857-7d755a780805@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79faa339-d6b8-d8eb-0857-7d755a780805@redhat.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-xfs , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Darrick J. Wong" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 04:58:20PM -0800, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Yeah probably. > > But now looking at > > aa2dd0ad4d6d xfs: remove __arch_pack > > hch indicates that some non-arm architectures have similar problems, > so is there any point to excluding this one config on this one arch? Yes, I think we just need to be more careful with our newly added structure layouts and whenever we do a major reorganization of an existing one. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel