public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Tyler Baicar <tyler@amperecomputing.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: acpi: Make apei_claim_sea() synchronise with APEI's irq work
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:48:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200228174817.74278-4-james.morse@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200228174817.74278-1-james.morse@arm.com>

APEI is unable to do all of its error handling work in nmi-context, so
it defers non-fatal work onto the irq_work queue. arch_irq_work_raise()
sends an IPI to the calling cpu, but this is not guaranteed to be taken
before returning to user-space.

Unless the exception interrupted a context with irqs-masked,
irq_work_run() can run immediately. Otherwise return -EINPROGRESS to
indicate ghes_notify_sea() found some work to do, but it hasn't
finished yet.

With this apei_claim_sea() returning '0' means this external-abort was
also notification of a firmware-first RAS error, and that APEI has
processed the CPER records.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
Changes since $last_year:
 * Dropped all the tags ... its been a year.
 * Added user_mode() test in do_sea() and expanded the comment.
 * Dont depend on daif value for return_to_irqs_enabled because of pNMI.
 * pr_warn() should be ratelimited
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c    | 12 +++++++-----
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
index a100483b47c4..46ec402e97ed 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/irq_work.h>
 #include <linux/memblock.h>
 #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
@@ -269,6 +270,7 @@ pgprot_t __acpi_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr)
 int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	int err = -ENOENT;
+	bool return_to_irqs_enabled;
 	unsigned long current_flags;
 
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES))
@@ -276,6 +278,12 @@ int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	current_flags = local_daif_save_flags();
 
+	/* current_flags isn't useful here as daif doesn't tell us about pNMI */
+	return_to_irqs_enabled = !irqs_disabled_flags(arch_local_save_flags());
+
+	if (regs)
+		return_to_irqs_enabled = interrupts_enabled(regs);
+
 	/*
 	 * SEA can interrupt SError, mask it and describe this as an NMI so
 	 * that APEI defers the handling.
@@ -284,6 +292,23 @@ int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	nmi_enter();
 	err = ghes_notify_sea();
 	nmi_exit();
+
+	/*
+	 * APEI NMI-like notifications are deferred to irq_work. Unless
+	 * we interrupted irqs-masked code, we can do that now.
+	 */
+	if (!err) {
+		if (return_to_irqs_enabled) {
+			local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ);
+			__irq_enter();
+			irq_work_run();
+			__irq_exit();
+		} else {
+			pr_warn_ratelimited("APEI work queued but not completed");
+			err = -EINPROGRESS;
+		}
+	}
+
 	local_daif_restore(current_flags);
 
 	return err;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index 85566d32958f..cefeb34580da 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -645,11 +645,13 @@ static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	inf = esr_to_fault_info(esr);
 
-	/*
-	 * Return value ignored as we rely on signal merging.
-	 * Future patches will make this more robust.
-	 */
-	apei_claim_sea(regs);
+	if (user_mode(regs) && apei_claim_sea(regs) == 0) {
+		/*
+		 * APEI claimed this as a firmware-first notification.
+		 * Some processing deferred to task_work before ret_to_user().
+		 */
+		return 0;
+	}
 
 	if (esr & ESR_ELx_FnV)
 		siaddr = NULL;
-- 
2.24.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-28 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-28 17:48 [PATCH 0/3] ACPI / APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors James Morse
2020-02-28 17:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/memory-failure: Add memory_failure_queue_kick() James Morse
2020-02-28 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] ACPI / APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors James Morse
2020-03-09 17:07   ` Tyler Baicar OS
2020-02-28 17:48 ` James Morse [this message]
2020-03-24 16:41   ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: acpi: Make apei_claim_sea() synchronise with APEI's irq work Catalin Marinas
2020-03-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] ACPI / APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors Tyler Baicar OS

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200228174817.74278-4-james.morse@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=tyler@amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox