From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D261C3F2CD for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21DBE24677 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="YkPzHfd5"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="BlVt49tT" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 21DBE24677 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=9Q9zgzZu1p03/Jf31QuiQWRHMUAnb8/3rGXFGlLxiow=; b=YkPzHfd5AxZj0d 6A1q+yzzN5qspA3TE4wjL5t/ZbAOu+RbEgYFMu7CwymqAYSXVC95RCtrPSXRqKUSzpsF0DdxznwxB G1eF5EiixnKYlCyz7IzikxNKH/l81Xa67LBiM0jF0bVultuPRVw+0oJgtnsClCw5sb9Dec+CMqjIa cj9qwmPrv7Ei+bhJ60TRZYOiduGYb8C74Kdy3swTYwOgWns+rO3sx9pqc8oZbJfCWwwzrPcFSdJVr fAM+KRdLHrBn26wE6KZlwuiicovKbESU53zOVshPPXzpQehjHMerq2iK9PYfQUYi2uEOfFYOkIX0j sDnUQZsYzJkeQsT1avqA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j7kX3-0000Yv-Gk; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:38:41 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j7kWy-0000YX-IN for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:38:38 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id 6so1956317pgk.0 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:38:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7Mj1CM/WyswvfaSTAEBfuMjiDk0djmCwfBfsrA3O5uc=; b=BlVt49tTxtV5Bde7kV6ngAmWl7rEt0i8rqnv7INClnaweok4PqrcznuNCW7HcNzaMz ljc/q6AvcKzmdVCiDy4mi/v6PxO5RTRYkjOyXw5URocA2fEmZot5OKlRsYrfCz1vr0Tr RsNIX1ns65INwth6gEZOzYmbcEj/+XiOKypop7ME4vEVgDxTX3ollzeTpmVQxpRxJv0X /f9kAtJPxHFCCepDzwCCSd5UGFFO6tSkCboCfPFaMPlHAray9Z33GJ47Z3UhzQO0TsU5 /D6aHhSxntnh8253NMf8uOkRBZ8QW46dl6etIkJ5EVG25OheZVCPdehinVQiV/l1UVPZ LChw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7Mj1CM/WyswvfaSTAEBfuMjiDk0djmCwfBfsrA3O5uc=; b=ZMIs4laRoQJJieRpg8L0Mq5xd8Zfk0DdtQFB5q9w2mEnEcObeZuGTNj9YYuzLOjMRV F643HJVboxCRqVKmygIfP674MfpnFIlZifYhUH176tpBNa+SZ6L8OTth5ojT0Z8yXlAN /mI02nbtRR92eNdbQd4B9J4vKcTzimjJ5TIyX7Tg/Et4UVq+wb2vCh52tgdg2sAimvGg N0/MmxTU/Xou1pMI3rHDZnwEceY7Xv3OEFRXvyJ0xIzmok9UW4VfPtTZrieK8l+85BOF oPhWKqBlel7zRPoIX8R41Xw5ChyfjER2U3Soa1fwaffVcRMh0lHPU08IAr7G5oKmj99a nCjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXzgjlYXno+ESkU+xCC+oEe0NfNxyGL4mUOwBQ5B6XEQ2/N+PmK y38M0siCM31kmCp6KrzeSUfTNA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwU0KE04kKPdLTj115noM9yxYuTjDpZIVSW/jvVwAsLLZopU3CtFzW4tbOFtdfVVt7ikP16Ow== X-Received: by 2002:a62:ce8b:: with SMTP id y133mr5773442pfg.172.1582915115515; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:38:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps15 (S0106002369de4dac.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.8.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b5sm12301691pfb.179.2020.02.28.10.38.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:38:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:38:32 -0700 From: Mathieu Poirier To: rishabhb@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] remoteproc: qcom: Add notification types to SSR Message-ID: <20200228183832.GA23026@xps15> References: <1582167465-2549-1-git-send-email-sidgup@codeaurora.org> <1582167465-2549-7-git-send-email-sidgup@codeaurora.org> <20200227215940.GC20116@xps15> <1a615fcd5a5c435d1d8babe8d5c3f8c3@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1a615fcd5a5c435d1d8babe8d5c3f8c3@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200228_103836_636980_B50D6774 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 31.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ohad@wizery.com, tsoni@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org, Siddharth Gupta , psodagud@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 04:00:21PM -0800, rishabhb@codeaurora.org wrote: > On 2020-02-27 13:59, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 06:57:45PM -0800, Siddharth Gupta wrote: > > > The SSR subdevice only adds callback for the unprepare event. Add > > > callbacks > > > for unprepare, start and prepare events. The client driver for a > > > particular > > > remoteproc might be interested in knowing the status of the remoteproc > > > while undergoing SSR, not just when the remoteproc has finished > > > shutting > > > down. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta > > > --- > > > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c | 39 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c > > > b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c > > > index 6714f27..6f04a5b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c > > > @@ -183,9 +183,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_remove_smd_subdev); > > > * > > > * Returns pointer to srcu notifier head on success, ERR_PTR on > > > failure. > > > * > > > - * This registers the @notify function as handler for restart > > > notifications. As > > > - * remote processors are stopped this function will be called, with > > > the rproc > > > - * pointer passed as a parameter. > > > + * This registers the @notify function as handler for > > > powerup/shutdown > > > + * notifications. This function will be invoked inside the > > > callbacks registered > > > + * for the ssr subdevice, with the rproc pointer passed as a > > > parameter. > > > */ > > > void *qcom_register_ssr_notifier(struct rproc *rproc, struct > > > notifier_block *nb) > > > { > > > @@ -227,11 +227,39 @@ int qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier(void *notify, > > > struct notifier_block *nb) > > > } > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier); > > > > > > +static int ssr_notify_prepare(struct rproc_subdev *subdev) > > > +{ > > > + struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr = to_ssr_subdev(subdev); > > > + > > > + srcu_notifier_call_chain(ssr->rproc_notif_list, > > > + RPROC_BEFORE_POWERUP, (void *)ssr->name); > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > + > > > +static int ssr_notify_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev) > > > +{ > > > + struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr = to_ssr_subdev(subdev); > > > + > > > + srcu_notifier_call_chain(ssr->rproc_notif_list, > > > + RPROC_AFTER_POWERUP, (void *)ssr->name); > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > + > > > +static void ssr_notify_stop(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool > > > crashed) > > > +{ > > > + struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr = to_ssr_subdev(subdev); > > > + > > > + srcu_notifier_call_chain(ssr->rproc_notif_list, > > > + RPROC_BEFORE_SHUTDOWN, (void *)ssr->name); > > > +} > > > + > > > + > > > static void ssr_notify_unprepare(struct rproc_subdev *subdev) > > > { > > > struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr = to_ssr_subdev(subdev); > > > > > > - srcu_notifier_call_chain(ssr->rproc_notif_list, 0, (void > > > *)ssr->name); > > > + srcu_notifier_call_chain(ssr->rproc_notif_list, > > > + RPROC_AFTER_SHUTDOWN, (void *)ssr->name); > > > } > > > > > > /** > > > @@ -248,6 +276,9 @@ void qcom_add_ssr_subdev(struct rproc *rproc, > > > struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr, > > > { > > > ssr->name = ssr_name; > > > ssr->subdev.name = kstrdup("ssr_notifs", GFP_KERNEL); > > > + ssr->subdev.prepare = ssr_notify_prepare; > > > + ssr->subdev.start = ssr_notify_start; > > > + ssr->subdev.stop = ssr_notify_stop; > > > > Now that I have a better understanding of what this patchset is doing, I > > realise > > my comments in patch 04 won't work. To differentiate the subdevs of an > > rproc I > > suggest to wrap them in a generic structure with a type and an enum. > > That way > > you can differenciate between subdevices without having to add to the > > core. > Ok. I can try that. > > > > That being said, I don't understand what patches 5 and 6 are doing... > > Registering with the global ssr_notifiers allowed to gracefully shutdown > > all the > > MCUs in the system when one of them would go down. But now that we are > > using > > the notifier on a per MCU, I really don't see why each subdev couldn't > > implement > > the right prepare/start/stop functions. > > > > Am I missing something here? > We only want kernel clients to be notified when the Remoteproc they are > interested > in changes state. For e.g. audio kernel driver should be notified when audio > processor goes down but it does not care about any other remoteproc. > If you are suggesting that these kernel clients be added as subdevices then > we will end up having many subdevices registered to each remoteproc. So we > implemented a notifier chain per Remoteproc. This keeps the SSR > notifications as > the subdevice per remoteproc, and all interested clients can register to it. It seems like I am missing information... Your are referring to "kernel clients" and as such I must assume some drivers that are not part of the remoteproc/rpmsg subsystems are calling qcom_register_ssr_notifier(). I must also assume these drivers (or that functionality) are not yet upsream because all I can see calling qcom_register_ssr_notifier() is qcom_glink_ssr_probe(). Speaking of which, what is the role of the qcom_glink_ssr_driver? Is the glink device that driver is handling the same as the glink device registed in adsp_probe() and q6v5_probe()? > > > > > > > ssr->subdev.unprepare = ssr_notify_unprepare; > > > ssr->rproc_notif_list = kzalloc(sizeof(struct srcu_notifier_head), > > > GFP_KERNEL); > > > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > > > index e2f60cc..4be4478 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > > > @@ -449,6 +449,21 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment { > > > }; > > > > > > /** > > > + * enum rproc_notif_type - Different stages of remoteproc > > > notifications > > > + * @RPROC_BEFORE_SHUTDOWN: unprepare stage of remoteproc > > > + * @RPROC_AFTER_SHUTDOWN: stop stage of remoteproc > > > + * @RPROC_BEFORE_POWERUP: prepare stage of remoteproc > > > + * @RPROC_AFTER_POWERUP: start stage of remoteproc > > > + */ > > > +enum rproc_notif_type { > > > + RPROC_BEFORE_SHUTDOWN, > > > + RPROC_AFTER_SHUTDOWN, > > > + RPROC_BEFORE_POWERUP, > > > + RPROC_AFTER_POWERUP, > > > + RPROC_MAX > > > +}; > > > + > > > +/** > > > * struct rproc - represents a physical remote processor device > > > * @node: list node of this rproc object > > > * @domain: iommu domain > > > -- > > > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > > > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel