From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76412C3F2D1 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 15:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FEB20828 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 15:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="pwS/g+3c" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 46FEB20828 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=SlYzO/48AfUHitiwDluy+RRAGx/QiR+zorocb3EXwnY=; b=pwS/g+3cG3ucbQ Ro8E7Q9dXNg38v8DiGxE9S+I1DGJBkbtQEGaoLRxIs1r/29MaHKolJlh60v1VtBDxccBPQBjRUTjY ecOemYQAEnbhuxi2etjGi/gpIQTH7tPnw7/MgCGjHkDymLZ0oHFoqecjhkbNhAPI7tWrXCpoEQEwT ho1yPYmsufiC4UDC4mTe8w6vJblNYn3cHFNFP2LPcPUErZjY73OrC8bNAg1oMthbXsEHA/ekCZypx 6nqWEvq4q/pY81IASWpBsX3TB5V2YYfQ6N7QhjSJGiNxh7P14BgopbgQ4klvxC2zXuRZFlCO3vEHv 2wOZ5V67iVeJGm21i7DQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j993v-0002Nd-Si; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 15:02:23 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j993s-0002MZ-4q for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 15:02:21 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A8AFEC; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 07:02:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.255]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DE6E3F6C4; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 07:02:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 15:02:09 +0000 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] Add support for PCIe endpoint mode in Tegra194 Message-ID: <20200303150209.GA6334@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20200303105418.2840-1-vidyas@nvidia.com> <20200303134053.GC2854899@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200303134053.GC2854899@ulmo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200303_070220_227722_27EF78C3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.63 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mmaddireddy@nvidia.com, kthota@nvidia.com, gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, Vidya Sagar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kishon@ti.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, andrew.murray@arm.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sagar.tv@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 02:40:53PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 04:24:13PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: > > Tegra194 has three (C0, C4 & C5) dual mode PCIe controllers that can operate > > either in root port mode or in end point mode but only in one mode at a time. > > Platform P2972-0000 supports enabling endpoint mode for C5 controller. This > > patch series adds support for PCIe endpoint mode in both the driver as well as > > in DT. > > This patch series depends on the changes made for Synopsys DesignWare endpoint > > mode subsystem that are recently accepted. > > @ https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/list/?series=202211 > > which in turn depends on the patch made by Kishon > > @ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10975123/ > > which is also under review. > > > > V4: > > * Started using threaded irqs instead of kthreads > > > > V3: > > * Re-ordered patches in the series to make the driver change as the last patch > > * Took care of Thierry's review comments > > > > V2: > > * Addressed Thierry & Bjorn's review comments > > * Added EP mode specific binding documentation to already existing binding documentation file > > * Removed patch that enables GPIO controller nodes explicitly as they are enabled already > > > > Vidya Sagar (5): > > soc/tegra: bpmp: Update ABI header > > dt-bindings: PCI: tegra: Add DT support for PCIe EP nodes in Tegra194 > > arm64: tegra: Add PCIe endpoint controllers nodes for Tegra194 > > arm64: tegra: Add support for PCIe endpoint mode in P2972-0000 > > platform > > PCI: tegra: Add support for PCIe endpoint mode in Tegra194 > > Hi Lorenzo, > > I've acked patches 1, 2 and 5 of the series. I think you're going to > need to apply patch 1 in order to satisfy a build-time dependency from > patch 5. I can apply patches 3 and 4 to the Tegra tree since they're > only adding device tree content that may conflict with some other > patches that I have in the Tegra tree. > > Does that sound reasonable? Sure, that's absolutely fine by me, I will do. Thanks, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel