Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: psci: Allow WFI to be the only state for the hierarchical topology

From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: psci: Allow WFI to be the only state for the hierarchical topology
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:23:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200304122312.GE25004@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200303203559.23995-5-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

The $subject is bit confusing. IIUC, if there are no idle states to
manage including hierarchical domain states you will not register the driver
right ? If so, you are not allowing WFI to be the only state, hence my
concern with $subject.

On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 09:35:59PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> It's possible that only the WFI state is supported for the CPU, while also
> a shared idle state exists for a group of CPUs.
>
> When the hierarchical topology is used, the shared idle state may not be
> compatible with arm,idle-state, rather with "domain-idle-state", which
> makes dt_init_idle_driver() to return zero. This leads to that the
> cpuidle-psci driver bails out during initialization, avoiding to register a
> cpuidle driver and instead relies on the default architectural back-end
> (called via cpu_do_idle()). In other words, the shared idle state becomes
> unused.
>
> Let's fix this behaviour, by allowing the dt_init_idle_driver() to return 0
> and then continue with the initialization. If it turns out that the
> hierarchical topology is used and we have some additional states to manage,
> then continue with the cpuidle driver registration, otherwise bail out as
> before.
>
> Reported-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
> Fixes: a65a397f2451 ("cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd")
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> 	- Convert the error code returned from psci_cpu_suspend_enter() into an
> 	expected error code by cpuidle core.
>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> index bae9140a65a5..ae0fabec2742 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> @@ -56,16 +56,19 @@ static int psci_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  	u32 *states = data->psci_states;
>  	struct device *pd_dev = data->dev;
>  	u32 state;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret = 0;
>
>  	/* Do runtime PM to manage a hierarchical CPU toplogy. */
>  	pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(pd_dev);
>
>  	state = psci_get_domain_state();
> -	if (!state)
> +	if (!state && states)
>  		state = states[idx];
>
> -	ret = psci_enter_state(idx, state);
> +	if (state)
> +		ret = psci_cpu_suspend_enter(state) ? -1 : idx;
> +	else
> +		cpu_do_idle();

May be, I haven't followed this completely yet, but I don't want to be
in the position to replicated default arch idle hook. Just use the one
that exist by simply not registering the driver.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel