linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: james.quinlan@broadcom.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] SCMI Notifications Core Support
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:33:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200309123346.00007dfb@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304162558.48836-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:25:45 +0000
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> this series wants to introduce SCMI Notification Support, built on top of
> the standard Kernel notification chain subsystem.
> 
> At initialization time each SCMI Protocol takes care to register with the
> new SCMI notification core the set of its own events which it intends to
> support.
> 
> Using the API exposed via scmi_handle.notify_ops a Kernel user can register
> its own notifier_t callback (via a notifier_block as usual) against any
> registered event as identified by the tuple:
> 
> 		(proto_id, event_id, src_id)
> 
> where src_id represents a generic source identifier which is protocol
> dependent like domain_id, performance_id, sensor_id and so forth.
> (users can anyway do NOT provide any src_id, and subscribe instead to ALL
>  the existing (if any) src_id sources for that proto_id/evt_id combination)
> 
> Each of the above tuple-specified event will be served on its own dedicated
> blocking notification chain, dynamically allocated on-demand when at least
> one user has shown interest on that event.
> 
> Upon a notification delivery all the users' registered notifier_t callbacks
> will be in turn invoked and fed with the event_id as @action param and a
> generated custom per-event struct _report as @data param.
> (as in include/linux/scmi_protocol.h)
> 
> The final step of notification delivery via users' callback invocation is
> instead delegated to a pool of deferred workers (Kernel cmwq): each
> SCMI protocol has its own dedicated worker and dedicated queue to push
> events from the rx ISR to the worker.
> 
> Based on scmi-next 5.6 [1], on top of:
> 
> commit 5c8a47a5a91d ("firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of
> 		      the transport type")
> 
> This series has been tested on JUNO with an experimental firmware only
> supporting Perf Notifications.

I've looked through all the patches.  A few of the comments go across
multiple patches, but once resolved feel free to add.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
to the ones I haven't specifically commented on.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Cristian
> ----
> 
> v3 --> v4:
> - dropped RFC tag
> - avoid one unneeded evt payload memcpy on the ISR RC code path by
>   redesigning dispatcher to handle partial queue-reads (in_flight events,
>   only header)
> - fixed the initialization issue exposed by late SCMI modules loading by
>   reviewing the init process to support possible late events registrations
>   by protocols and early callbacks registrations by users (pending)
> - cleanup/simplification of exit path: SCMI protocols are generally never
>   de-initialized after the initial device creation, so do not deinit
>   notification core either (we do halt the delivery, stop the wq and empty
>   the queues though)
> - reduced contention on regustered_events_handler to the minimum during
>   delivery by splitting the common registered_events_handlers hashtable
>   into a number of per-protocol tables
> - converted registered_protocols and registered_events hastable to
>   fixed size arrays: simpler and lockless in our usage scenario
> 
> v2 --> v3:
> - added platform instance awareness to the notification core: a
>   notification instance is created for each known handle
> - reviewed notification core initialization and shutdown process
> - removed generic non-handle-rooted registration API
> - added WQ_SYSFS flag to workqueue instance
> 
> v1 --> v2:
> - dropped anti-tampering patch
> - rebased on top of scmi-for-next-5.6, which includes Viresh series that
>   make SCMI core independent of transport (5c8a47a5a91d)
> - add a few new SCMI transport methods on top of Viresh patch to address
>   needs of SCMI Notifications
> - reviewed/renamed scmi_handle_xfer_delayed_resp()
> - split main SCMI Notification core patch (~1k lines) into three chunks:
>   protocol-registration / callbacks-registration / dispatch-and-delivery
> - removed awkward usage of IDR maps in favour of pure hashtables
> - added enable/disable refcounting in notification core (was broken in v1)
> - removed per-protocol candidate API: a single generic API is now proposed
>   instead of scmi_register_<proto>_event_notifier(evt_id, *src_id, *nb)
> - added handle->notify_ops as an alternative notification API
>   for scmi_driver
> - moved ALL_SRCIDs enabled handling from protocol code to core code
> - reviewed protocol registration/unregistration logic to use devres
> - reviewed cleanup phase on shutdown
> - fixed  ERROR: reference preceded by free as reported by kbuild test robot
> 
> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux.git
> 
> 
> Cristian Marussi (10):
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Add notifications support in transport layer
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification protocol-registration
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification callbacks-registration
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification dispatch and delivery
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Enable notification core
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Add Power notifications support
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Add Perf notifications support
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Add Sensor notifications support
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Add Reset notifications support
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Add Base notifications support
> 
> Sudeep Holla (3):
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive buffer support for notifications
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Update protocol commands and notification list
>   firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for notifications message processing
> 
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile  |    2 +-
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c    |  116 +++
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h  |   12 +
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c  |  118 ++-
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c |   17 +
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c  | 1471 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.h  |   78 ++
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c    |  135 +++
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/power.c   |  129 +++
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/reset.c   |   96 ++
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c |   73 ++
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c   |   15 +
>  include/linux/scmi_protocol.h       |  110 ++
>  13 files changed, 2345 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.h
> 



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-09 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-04 16:25 [PATCH v4 00/13] SCMI Notifications Core Support Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive buffer support for notifications Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Update protocol commands and notification list Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notifications support in transport layer Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for notifications message processing Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification protocol-registration Cristian Marussi
2020-03-09 11:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-03-09 12:04     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification callbacks-registration Cristian Marussi
2020-03-09 11:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-03-09 12:25     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification dispatch and delivery Cristian Marussi
2020-03-09 12:26   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-03-09 16:37     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-10 10:01       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-03-12 13:51   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-03-12 14:06     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-03-12 19:24       ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-12 20:57         ` Lukasz Luba
2020-03-12 18:34     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-12 21:43       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-03-16 14:46         ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-18  8:26           ` Lukasz Luba
2020-03-23  8:28             ` Cristian Marussi
2020-05-20  7:09           ` Cristian Marussi
2020-05-20 10:23             ` Lukasz Luba
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Enable notification core Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Power notifications support Cristian Marussi
2020-03-09 12:28   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-03-09 16:39     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Perf " Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Sensor " Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Reset " Cristian Marussi
2020-03-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Base " Cristian Marussi
2020-03-09 12:33 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200309123346.00007dfb@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).