[PATCH 0/4] irqchip: Random irq_retrigger fixes

[PATCH 0/4] irqchip: Random irq_retrigger fixes

[Marc Zyngier]

As I was investigating some ugly retrigger locking issues (see patch 4),
I managed to find three occurences of irq_retrigger callbacks that return
the wrong value, leading to a SW retrigger on top of the HW one.

Not really a big deal, but definitely worth fixing.

Marc Zyngier (4):
  irqchip/atmel-aic: Fix irq_retrigger callback return value
  irqchip/atmel-aic5: Fix irq_retrigger callback return value
  ARM: sa1111: Fix irq_retrigger callback return value
  irqchip/gic-v4: Provide irq_retrigger to avoid circular locking
    dependency

 arch/arm/common/sa1111.c         | 7 +++++--
 drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c  | 2 +-
 drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic5.c | 2 +-
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 6 ++++++
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/4] irqchip/atmel-aic: Fix irq_retrigger callback return value

[Marc Zyngier]

The irq_retrigger callback is supposed to return 0 when retrigger
has failed, and a non-zero value otherwise. Tell the core code
that the driver has succedded in using the HW to retrigger the
interrupt.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c
index bb1ad451392f..2c999dc310c1 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int aic_retrigger(struct irq_data *d)
 	irq_reg_writel(gc, d->mask, AT91_AIC_ISCR);
 	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
 
-	return 0;
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static int aic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/4] irqchip/atmel-aic5: Fix irq_retrigger callback return value

[Marc Zyngier]

The irq_retrigger callback is supposed to return 0 when retrigger
has failed, and a non-zero value otherwise. Tell the core code
that the driver has succedded in using the HW to retrigger the
interrupt.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic5.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic5.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic5.c
index 29333497ba10..fc1b3a9cdafc 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic5.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic5.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int aic5_retrigger(struct irq_data *d)
 	irq_reg_writel(bgc, 1, AT91_AIC5_ISCR);
 	irq_gc_unlock(bgc);
 
-	return 0;
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static int aic5_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/4] ARM: sa1111: Fix irq_retrigger callback return value

[Marc Zyngier]

The irq_retrigger callback is supposed to return 0 when retrigger
has failed, and a non-zero value otherwise. Tell the core code
that the driver has succedded in using the HW to retrigger the
interrupt (if ever).

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm/common/sa1111.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
index 947ef7981d92..c98ebae1aeac 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
@@ -302,10 +302,13 @@ static int sa1111_retrigger_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 			break;
 	}
 
-	if (i == 8)
+	if (i == 8) {
 		pr_err("Danger Will Robinson: failed to re-trigger IRQ%d\n",
 		       d->irq);
-	return i == 8 ? -1 : 0;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static int sa1111_type_irq(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flags)
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 4/4] irqchip/gic-v4: Provide irq_retrigger to avoid circular locking dependency

[Marc Zyngier]

On a very heavily loaded D05 with GICv4, I managed to trigger the
following lockdep splat:

[ 6022.598864] ======================================================
[ 6022.605031] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 6022.611200] 5.6.0-rc4-00026-geee7c7b0f498 #680 Tainted: G            E
[ 6022.618061] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 6022.624227] qemu-system-aar/7569 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 6022.629789] ffff042f97606808 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}, at: try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0
[ 6022.637102]
[ 6022.637102] but task is already holding lock:
[ 6022.642921] ffff002fae424cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98
[ 6022.651350]
[ 6022.651350] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 6022.651350]
[ 6022.659512]
[ 6022.659512] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 6022.666980]
[ 6022.666980] -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}:
[ 6022.672983]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78
[ 6022.677848]        __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98
[ 6022.682453]        irq_set_vcpu_affinity+0x40/0xc0
[ 6022.687236]        its_make_vpe_non_resident+0x6c/0xb8
[ 6022.692364]        vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70
[ 6022.696273]        vgic_v3_put+0x20/0xd8
[ 6022.700183]        kvm_vgic_put+0x30/0x48
[ 6022.704182]        kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x34/0x50
[ 6022.708614]        kvm_sched_out+0x34/0x50
[ 6022.712700]        __schedule+0x4bc/0x7f8
[ 6022.716697]        schedule+0x50/0xd8
[ 6022.720347]        kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5f0/0x978
[ 6022.725473]        kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8
[ 6022.729820]        ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0
[ 6022.733642]        __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30
[ 6022.738074]        el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8
[ 6022.743373]        do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88
[ 6022.747198]        el0_svc+0x14/0x40
[ 6022.750761]        el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8
[ 6022.755278]        el0_sync+0x140/0x180
[ 6022.759100]
[ 6022.759100] -> #1 (&rq->lock){-.-.}:
[ 6022.764143]        _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50
[ 6022.768314]        task_fork_fair+0x40/0x128
[ 6022.772572]        sched_fork+0xe0/0x210
[ 6022.776484]        copy_process+0x8c4/0x18d8
[ 6022.780742]        _do_fork+0x88/0x6d8
[ 6022.784478]        kernel_thread+0x64/0x88
[ 6022.788563]        rest_init+0x30/0x270
[ 6022.792390]        arch_call_rest_init+0x14/0x1c
[ 6022.796995]        start_kernel+0x498/0x4c4
[ 6022.801164]
[ 6022.801164] -> #0 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}:
[ 6022.806382]        __lock_acquire+0xdd8/0x15c8
[ 6022.810813]        lock_acquire+0xd0/0x218
[ 6022.814896]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78
[ 6022.819761]        try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0
[ 6022.824018]        wake_up_process+0x1c/0x28
[ 6022.828276]        wakeup_softirqd+0x38/0x40
[ 6022.832533]        __tasklet_schedule_common+0xc4/0xf0
[ 6022.837658]        __tasklet_schedule+0x24/0x30
[ 6022.842176]        check_irq_resend+0xc8/0x158
[ 6022.846609]        irq_startup+0x74/0x128
[ 6022.850606]        __enable_irq+0x6c/0x78
[ 6022.854602]        enable_irq+0x54/0xa0
[ 6022.858431]        its_make_vpe_non_resident+0xa4/0xb8
[ 6022.863557]        vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70
[ 6022.867469]        kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking+0x28/0x38
[ 6022.872336]        kvm_vcpu_block+0x48/0x490
[ 6022.876594]        kvm_handle_wfx+0x18c/0x310
[ 6022.880938]        handle_exit+0x138/0x198
[ 6022.885022]        kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x978
[ 6022.890148]        kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8
[ 6022.894494]        ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0
[ 6022.898317]        __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30
[ 6022.902748]        el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8
[ 6022.908046]        do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88
[ 6022.911871]        el0_svc+0x14/0x40
[ 6022.915434]        el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8
[ 6022.919951]        el0_sync+0x140/0x180
[ 6022.923773]
[ 6022.923773] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 6022.923773]
[ 6022.931762] Chain exists of:
[ 6022.931762]   &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock --> &irq_desc_lock_class
[ 6022.931762]
[ 6022.942101]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 6022.942101]
[ 6022.948007]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 6022.952523]        ----                    ----
[ 6022.957039]   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
[ 6022.961036]                                lock(&rq->lock);
[ 6022.966595]                                lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
[ 6022.973109]   lock(&p->pi_lock);
[ 6022.976324]
[ 6022.976324]  *** DEADLOCK ***

This is happening because we have a pending doorbell that requires
retrigger. As SW retriggering is done in a tasklet, we trigger the
circular dependency above.

The easy cop-out is to provide a retrigger callback that doesn't
require acquiring any extra lock.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 83b1186ffcad..fd0758a29b5f 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -3675,12 +3675,18 @@ static int its_vpe_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int its_vpe_retrigger(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	return !its_vpe_set_irqchip_state(d, IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, true);
+}
+
 static struct irq_chip its_vpe_irq_chip = {
 	.name			= "GICv4-vpe",
 	.irq_mask		= its_vpe_mask_irq,
 	.irq_unmask		= its_vpe_unmask_irq,
 	.irq_eoi		= irq_chip_eoi_parent,
 	.irq_set_affinity	= its_vpe_set_affinity,
+	.irq_retrigger		= its_vpe_retrigger,
 	.irq_set_irqchip_state	= its_vpe_set_irqchip_state,
 	.irq_set_vcpu_affinity	= its_vpe_set_vcpu_affinity,
 };
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel