[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 01/20] drm/mediatek: Find the cursor plane instead of hard coding it

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 01/20] drm/mediatek: Find the cursor plane instead of hard coding it

[Sasha Levin]

From: Evan Benn <evanbenn@chromium.org>

[ Upstream commit 318caac7c81cdf5806df30c3d72385659a5f0f53 ]

The cursor and primary planes were hard coded.
Now search for them for passing to drm_crtc_init_with_planes

Signed-off-by: Evan Benn <evanbenn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
index b86ee7d25af36..eac9caf322f90 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
@@ -506,10 +506,18 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs mtk_crtc_helper_funcs = {
 
 static int mtk_drm_crtc_init(struct drm_device *drm,
 			     struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc,
-			     struct drm_plane *primary,
-			     struct drm_plane *cursor, unsigned int pipe)
+			     unsigned int pipe)
 {
-	int ret;
+	struct drm_plane *primary = NULL;
+	struct drm_plane *cursor = NULL;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->layer_nr; i++) {
+		if (mtk_crtc->planes[i].type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY)
+			primary = &mtk_crtc->planes[i];
+		else if (mtk_crtc->planes[i].type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR)
+			cursor = &mtk_crtc->planes[i];
+	}
 
 	ret = drm_crtc_init_with_planes(drm, &mtk_crtc->base, primary, cursor,
 					&mtk_crtc_funcs, NULL);
@@ -622,9 +630,7 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
 			goto unprepare;
 	}
 
-	ret = mtk_drm_crtc_init(drm_dev, mtk_crtc, &mtk_crtc->planes[0],
-				mtk_crtc->layer_nr > 1 ? &mtk_crtc->planes[1] :
-				NULL, pipe);
+	ret = mtk_drm_crtc_init(drm_dev, mtk_crtc, pipe);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto unprepare;
 	drm_mode_crtc_set_gamma_size(&mtk_crtc->base, MTK_LUT_SIZE);
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 02/20] ARM: dts: imx6dl-colibri-eval-v3: fix sram compatible properties

[Sasha Levin]

From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit bcbf53a0dab50980867476994f6079c1ec5bb3a3 ]

The sram-node compatible properties have mistakingly combined the
model-specific string with the generic "mtd-ram" string.

Note that neither "cy7c1019dv33-10zsxi, mtd-ram" or
"cy7c1019dv33-10zsxi" are used by any in-kernel driver and they are
not present in any binding.

The physmap driver will however bind to platform devices that specify
"mtd-ram".

Fixes: fc48e76489fd ("ARM: dts: imx6: Add support for Toradex Colibri iMX6 module")
Cc: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-colibri-eval-v3.dts | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-colibri-eval-v3.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-colibri-eval-v3.dts
index 9de45a7173561..50a7ec0875535 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-colibri-eval-v3.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-colibri-eval-v3.dts
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@
 
 	/* SRAM on Colibri nEXT_CS0 */
 	sram@0,0 {
-		compatible = "cypress,cy7c1019dv33-10zsxi, mtd-ram";
+		compatible = "cypress,cy7c1019dv33-10zsxi", "mtd-ram";
 		reg = <0 0 0x00010000>;
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <1>;
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@
 
 	/* SRAM on Colibri nEXT_CS1 */
 	sram@1,0 {
-		compatible = "cypress,cy7c1019dv33-10zsxi, mtd-ram";
+		compatible = "cypress,cy7c1019dv33-10zsxi", "mtd-ram";
 		reg = <1 0 0x00010000>;
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <1>;
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 06/20] spi: pxa2xx: Add CS control clock quirk

[Sasha Levin]

From: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>

[ Upstream commit 683f65ded66a9a7ff01ed7280804d2132ebfdf7e ]

In some circumstances on Intel LPSS controllers, toggling the LPSS
CS control register doesn't actually cause the CS line to toggle.
This seems to be failure of dynamic clock gating that occurs after
going through a suspend/resume transition, where the controller
is sent through a reset transition. This ruins SPI transactions
that either rely on delay_usecs, or toggle the CS line without
sending data.

Whenever CS is toggled, momentarily set the clock gating register
to "Force On" to poke the controller into acting on CS.

Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211223700.110252-1-rajatja@google.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
index 525388126e260..e4482823d8d75 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
@@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pxa2xx-spi");
 #define LPSS_CAPS_CS_EN_SHIFT			9
 #define LPSS_CAPS_CS_EN_MASK			(0xf << LPSS_CAPS_CS_EN_SHIFT)
 
+#define LPSS_PRIV_CLOCK_GATE 0x38
+#define LPSS_PRIV_CLOCK_GATE_CLK_CTL_MASK 0x3
+#define LPSS_PRIV_CLOCK_GATE_CLK_CTL_FORCE_ON 0x3
+
 struct lpss_config {
 	/* LPSS offset from drv_data->ioaddr */
 	unsigned offset;
@@ -92,6 +96,8 @@ struct lpss_config {
 	unsigned cs_sel_shift;
 	unsigned cs_sel_mask;
 	unsigned cs_num;
+	/* Quirks */
+	unsigned cs_clk_stays_gated : 1;
 };
 
 /* Keep these sorted with enum pxa_ssp_type */
@@ -162,6 +168,7 @@ static const struct lpss_config lpss_platforms[] = {
 		.tx_threshold_hi = 56,
 		.cs_sel_shift = 8,
 		.cs_sel_mask = 3 << 8,
+		.cs_clk_stays_gated = true,
 	},
 };
 
@@ -389,6 +396,22 @@ static void lpss_ssp_cs_control(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable)
 	else
 		value |= LPSS_CS_CONTROL_CS_HIGH;
 	__lpss_ssp_write_priv(drv_data, config->reg_cs_ctrl, value);
+	if (config->cs_clk_stays_gated) {
+		u32 clkgate;
+
+		/*
+		 * Changing CS alone when dynamic clock gating is on won't
+		 * actually flip CS at that time. This ruins SPI transfers
+		 * that specify delays, or have no data. Toggle the clock mode
+		 * to force on briefly to poke the CS pin to move.
+		 */
+		clkgate = __lpss_ssp_read_priv(drv_data, LPSS_PRIV_CLOCK_GATE);
+		value = (clkgate & ~LPSS_PRIV_CLOCK_GATE_CLK_CTL_MASK) |
+			LPSS_PRIV_CLOCK_GATE_CLK_CTL_FORCE_ON;
+
+		__lpss_ssp_write_priv(drv_data, LPSS_PRIV_CLOCK_GATE, value);
+		__lpss_ssp_write_priv(drv_data, LPSS_PRIV_CLOCK_GATE, clkgate);
+	}
 }
 
 static void cs_assert(struct spi_device *spi)
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 07/20] spi/zynqmp: remove entry that causes a cs glitch

[Sasha Levin]

From: Thommy Jakobsson <thommyj@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 5dd8304981ecffa77bb72b1c57c4be5dfe6cfae9 ]

In the public interface for chipselect, there is always an entry
commented as "Dummy generic FIFO entry" pushed down to the fifo right
after the activate/deactivate command. The dummy entry is 0x0,
irregardless if the intention was to activate or deactive the cs. This
causes the cs line to glitch rather than beeing activated in the case
when there was an activate command.

This has been observed on oscilloscope, and have caused problems for at
least one specific flash device type connected to the qspi port. After
the change the glitch is gone and cs goes active when intended.

The reason why this worked before (except for the glitch) was because
when sending the actual data, the CS bits are once again set. Since
most flashes uses mode 0, there is always a half clk period anyway for
cs to clk active setup time. If someone would rely on timing from a
chip_select call to a transfer_one, it would fail though.

It is unknown why the dummy entry was there in the first place, git log
seems to be of no help in this case. The reference manual gives no
indication of the necessity of this. In fact the lower 8 bits are a
setup (or hold in case of deactivate) time expressed in cycles. So this
should not be needed to fulfill any setup/hold timings.

Signed-off-by: Thommy Jakobsson <thommyj@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200224162643.29102-1-thommyj@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c
index cc4d310334943..f2848c59b0b8e 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c
@@ -403,9 +403,6 @@ static void zynqmp_qspi_chipselect(struct spi_device *qspi, bool is_high)
 
 	zynqmp_gqspi_write(xqspi, GQSPI_GEN_FIFO_OFST, genfifoentry);
 
-	/* Dummy generic FIFO entry */
-	zynqmp_gqspi_write(xqspi, GQSPI_GEN_FIFO_OFST, 0x0);
-
 	/* Manually start the generic FIFO command */
 	zynqmp_gqspi_write(xqspi, GQSPI_CONFIG_OFST,
 			zynqmp_gqspi_read(xqspi, GQSPI_CONFIG_OFST) |
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 08/20] drm/exynos: dsi: propagate error value and silence meaningless warning

[Sasha Levin]

From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

[ Upstream commit 0a9d1e3f3f038785ebc72d53f1c409d07f6b4ff5 ]

Properly propagate error value from devm_regulator_bulk_get() and don't
confuse user with meaningless warning about failure in getting regulators
in case of deferred probe.

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
index 781b82c2c579b..b23adce9d00a7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
@@ -1722,8 +1722,9 @@ static int exynos_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(dsi->supplies),
 				      dsi->supplies);
 	if (ret) {
-		dev_info(dev, "failed to get regulators: %d\n", ret);
-		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			dev_info(dev, "failed to get regulators: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	dsi->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev,
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 09/20] drm/exynos: dsi: fix workaround for the legacy clock name

[Sasha Levin]

From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

[ Upstream commit c0fd99d659ba5582e09625c7a985d63fc2ca74b5 ]

Writing to the built-in strings arrays doesn't work if driver is loaded
as kernel module. This is also considered as a bad pattern. Fix this by
adding a call to clk_get() with legacy clock name. This fixes following
kernel oops if driver is loaded as module:

Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address bf047978
 pgd = (ptrval)
 [bf047978] *pgd=59344811, *pte=5903c6df, *ppte=5903c65f
 Internal error: Oops: 80f [#1] SMP ARM
 Modules linked in: mc exynosdrm(+) analogix_dp rtc_s3c exynos_ppmu i2c_gpio
 CPU: 1 PID: 212 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200219 #326
 videodev: Linux video capture interface: v2.00
 Hardware name: Samsung Exynos (Flattened Device Tree)
 PC is at exynos_dsi_probe+0x1f0/0x384 [exynosdrm]
 LR is at exynos_dsi_probe+0x1dc/0x384 [exynosdrm]
 ...
 Process systemd-udevd (pid: 212, stack limit = 0x(ptrval))
 ...
 [<bf03cf14>] (exynos_dsi_probe [exynosdrm]) from [<c09b1ca0>] (platform_drv_probe+0x6c/0xa4)
 [<c09b1ca0>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c09afcb8>] (really_probe+0x210/0x350)
 [<c09afcb8>] (really_probe) from [<c09aff74>] (driver_probe_device+0x60/0x1a0)
 [<c09aff74>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c09b0254>] (device_driver_attach+0x58/0x60)
 [<c09b0254>] (device_driver_attach) from [<c09b02dc>] (__driver_attach+0x80/0xbc)
 [<c09b02dc>] (__driver_attach) from [<c09ade00>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xb4)
 [<c09ade00>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c09aefd8>] (bus_add_driver+0x130/0x1e8)
 [<c09aefd8>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c09b0d64>] (driver_register+0x78/0x110)
 [<c09b0d64>] (driver_register) from [<bf038558>] (exynos_drm_init+0xe8/0x11c [exynosdrm])
 [<bf038558>] (exynos_drm_init [exynosdrm]) from [<c0302fa8>] (do_one_initcall+0x50/0x220)
 [<c0302fa8>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c03dd02c>] (do_init_module+0x60/0x210)
 [<c03dd02c>] (do_init_module) from [<c03dbf44>] (load_module+0x1c0c/0x2310)
 [<c03dbf44>] (load_module) from [<c03dc85c>] (sys_finit_module+0xac/0xbc)
 [<c03dc85c>] (sys_finit_module) from [<c0301000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54)
 Exception stack(0xd979bfa8 to 0xd979bff0)
 ...
 ---[ end trace db16efe05faab470 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
index b23adce9d00a7..8d776070913da 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
@@ -1737,9 +1737,10 @@ static int exynos_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		dsi->clks[i] = devm_clk_get(dev, clk_names[i]);
 		if (IS_ERR(dsi->clks[i])) {
 			if (strcmp(clk_names[i], "sclk_mipi") == 0) {
-				strcpy(clk_names[i], OLD_SCLK_MIPI_CLK_NAME);
-				i--;
-				continue;
+				dsi->clks[i] = devm_clk_get(dev,
+							OLD_SCLK_MIPI_CLK_NAME);
+				if (!IS_ERR(dsi->clks[i]))
+					continue;
 			}
 
 			dev_info(dev, "failed to get the clock: %s\n",
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 10/20] drivers/perf: arm_pmu_acpi: Fix incorrect checking of gicc pointer

[Sasha Levin]

From: luanshi <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com>

[ Upstream commit 3ba52ad55b533760a1f65836aa0ec9d35e36bb4f ]

Fix bogus NULL checks on the return value of acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc()
by checking for a 0 'gicc->performance_interrupt' value instead.

Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
index 0f197516d7089..9a6f7f822566f 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ static int arm_pmu_acpi_register_irq(int cpu)
 	int gsi, trigger;
 
 	gicc = acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu);
-	if (WARN_ON(!gicc))
-		return -EINVAL;
 
 	gsi = gicc->performance_interrupt;
 
@@ -67,11 +65,10 @@ static void arm_pmu_acpi_unregister_irq(int cpu)
 	int gsi;
 
 	gicc = acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu);
-	if (!gicc)
-		return;
 
 	gsi = gicc->performance_interrupt;
-	acpi_unregister_gsi(gsi);
+	if (gsi)
+		acpi_unregister_gsi(gsi);
 }
 
 static int arm_pmu_acpi_parse_irqs(void)
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel