From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/26] arm64: vdso32: Replace TASK_SIZE_32 check in vgettimeofday
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:38:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200317143834.GC632169@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200317122220.30393-19-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:22:12PM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vgettimeofday.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vgettimeofday.c
> index 54fc1c2ce93f..91138077b073 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vgettimeofday.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vgettimeofday.c
> @@ -8,11 +8,14 @@
> #include <linux/time.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> +#define VALID_CLOCK_ID(x) \
> + ((x >= 0) && (x < VDSO_BASES))
> +
> int __vdso_clock_gettime(clockid_t clock,
> struct old_timespec32 *ts)
> {
> /* The checks below are required for ABI consistency with arm */
> - if ((u32)ts >= TASK_SIZE_32)
> + if ((u32)ts > UINTPTR_MAX - sizeof(*ts) + 1)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> return __cvdso_clock_gettime32(clock, ts);
I probably miss something but I can't find the TASK_SIZE check in the
arch/arm/vdso/vgettimeofday.c code. Is this done elsewhere?
> @@ -22,7 +25,7 @@ int __vdso_clock_gettime64(clockid_t clock,
> struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
> {
> /* The checks below are required for ABI consistency with arm */
> - if ((u32)ts >= TASK_SIZE_32)
> + if ((u32)ts > UINTPTR_MAX - sizeof(*ts) + 1)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> return __cvdso_clock_gettime(clock, ts);
> @@ -38,9 +41,12 @@ int __vdso_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id,
> struct old_timespec32 *res)
> {
> /* The checks below are required for ABI consistency with arm */
> - if ((u32)res >= TASK_SIZE_32)
> + if ((u32)res > UINTPTR_MAX - sizeof(res) + 1)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> + if (!VALID_CLOCK_ID(clock_id) && res == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
This last check needs an explanation. If the clock_id is invalid but res
is not NULL, we allow it. I don't see where the compatibility issue is,
arm32 doesn't have such check.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-17 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-17 12:21 [PATCH v4 00/26] Introduce common headers for vDSO Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 01/26] linux/const.h: Extract common header " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 02/26] linux/bits.h: " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 03/26] linux/limits.h: " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 04/26] x86:Introduce asm/vdso/clocksource.h Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 05/26] arm: Introduce asm/vdso/clocksource.h Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 06/26] arm64: " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 07/26] mips: " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 08/26] linux/clocksource.h: Extract common header for vDSO Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 09/26] linux/math64.h: " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 10/26] linux/time.h: " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 11/26] linux/time32.h: " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 12/26] linux/time64.h: " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 13/26] linux/jiffies.h: " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 14/26] linux/ktime.h: " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 15/26] common: Introduce processor.h Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 16/26] scripts: Fix the inclusion order in modpost Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 17/26] linux/elfnote.h: Replace elf.h with UAPI equivalent Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 18/26] arm64: vdso32: Replace TASK_SIZE_32 check in vgettimeofday Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 14:38 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2020-03-17 15:04 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 15:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-17 16:40 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 16:43 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 17:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-18 16:14 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-18 18:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-19 12:38 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-19 18:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-20 13:05 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-20 14:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-20 14:41 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-19 15:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-19 16:58 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-19 18:32 ` Will Deacon
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 19/26] arm64: Introduce asm/vdso/processor.h Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 17:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 20/26] arm64: vdso: Include common headers in the vdso library Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 21/26] arm64: vdso32: " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 22/26] mips: vdso: Enable mips to use common headers Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 23/26] x86: vdso: Enable x86 " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 24/26] arm: vdso: Enable arm " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 25/26] lib: vdso: Enable " Vincenzo Frascino
2020-03-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 26/26] arm64: vdso32: Enable Clang Compilation Vincenzo Frascino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200317143834.GC632169@arrakis.emea.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=salyzyn@android.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).