From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F35DC5ACD6 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA012076E for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="KJUq8+aj" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2BA012076E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=0keSXKKQZHgzrYXjCAM/nHyctNyATLbFkb4ZuBpbILM=; b=KJUq8+ajfNHhjz oP/31Xc31fh9OvoCqCv7ug/z8/PPph7Q7AFShp9iz62lMEsorGXXn8cFxtaxMMV9lurlG3zOGt3rj irQA1lNtZi/vqHLH4bluZKDF3pLvmvbmaY7kuz4uMoMhsEc3wCbogNxBsJWuWED1GDJ4CPxTWWhTs on6f+6ULZ4eQHyzOwH5K+5AvPKQYu3dFrt53pdzpEGKHbxXw+RccCx0Fqkjtm9n5BI8wm54+wJfpt eNFI0V01e3Cey1Z92ov64UlAqdFX0jKHRg3ovow+3K8faLyXBexrPPOz4/jIog5pVjOlMp1xWZ5gX PtQsxwOpn9HiWrv9OGEw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jEXj4-00051N-MW; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:23:10 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jEXj1-00050c-Nn for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:23:09 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3521FB; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 05:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arrakis.emea.arm.com (arrakis.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.71]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5320B3F534; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 05:23:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:23:04 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: arm64/for-kernelci build: 3 builds: 1 failed, 2 passed, 1 error (v5.6-rc6-67-gcf89e8c383a6) Message-ID: <20200318122304.GB94111@arrakis.emea.arm.com> References: <5e715a20.1c69fb81.d52f4.2251@mx.google.com> <20200318082830.GA31312@willie-the-truck> <20200318120614.GA94111@arrakis.emea.arm.com> <20200318121627.GC4553@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200318121627.GC4553@sirena.org.uk> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200318_052307_819809_52F5A75B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "kernelci.org bot" , kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:16:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:06:14PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > If ARCH_USE_GNU_PROPERTY is specific to ELF only, I'd rather not select > > it unconditionally (and the option should probably depend on > > BINFMT_ELF). Following the pattern of ARCH_HAVE_EXTRA_ELF_NOTES, we > > could fix it up as below: > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h > > index 4f00d50585a4..2eef3672de50 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h > > @@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ struct arch_elf_state { > > .flags = 0, \ > > } > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USE_GNU_PROPERTY > > That makes sense to me. > > > +#endif > > > > static inline int arch_elf_pt_proc(void *ehdr, void *phdr, > > struct file *f, bool is_interp, > > Though presumably this is all eventually dead code too? I'll let you pick one ;), I don't have a strong preference either way. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel