From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA4AC43331 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC4020714 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="UEsmd+iM"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="KguwooGs" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DDC4020714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=nl7Rxy0BKQII0VVZ3x7+T6PikEuSzK7RYBTHMT4dXqM=; b=UEsmd+iMF/P8Oa w9unT8iRfaKkpwlw1wKTHm7yqCaQZwpoZSogqw8Y9VEyV/AgLwWzH9CfWnR/MefW1AnDItZ5VXXla kNb/Yv5MI6PIh2n7q+5PNeJOGZI565iLx1wIAaCb2XyfqCwOxzBy1kxjLjSaTt/T0MQal1ohMxRdS +AQknydz9H5HY34nhmpEuuIf3QUcIGF1wvf6xqMUXeMNlIzKdsFenavbr45I8x7ASjX4zlPvObn5P 2oYkgD3WxU/R9AROZ5pHlg1apKGcDQuceGRDcERQQtTaPD/Gn7AXHD3MeJjU40Oc8dDVr31FfHw60 UhdLGM00NZc/8ChTP0OQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jHYPH-0001VY-VE; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:43:11 +0000 Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jHYPE-0001VD-CK for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:43:09 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id f206so3302806pfa.10 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:43:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=UGAInaue7GSFpt799maDJX4PnvgR4YSaBrw6mv4yOuk=; b=KguwooGsTz40f9cvcDxM2GNej0d6GxRAuvL6H5rS2U2v7SuftTKbyWwCoyrbVU3Ran VyD2YsLLg4xfZTRozdTd/JY90atjqoOpyPsEJjDzEgufF+wEMTpcE9MagelT/9cM8rva QrE54uxvU0eXm4LkVkrQl5WgpIwRwN69ZnuS/VeB9cIZ12+TL/6uHMUaz5OfwZH7g6gX YxxUMnphBeI2VAuIg77Dt7Xx2x+goewYVKpeBqxiX70yfRkUTuFEx1Bkcvfl4H8KhpYo 8xpDJePD6vF39IcomlmlCm4/vnfi0aW9XyeDzV0/RiS+yCNpFXy9NGbVAaLleQ8A+QFj zhbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=UGAInaue7GSFpt799maDJX4PnvgR4YSaBrw6mv4yOuk=; b=jfrtjtVvxmpQ9ZNMuhDlppupZRxd2ChDjMV2d53VFXcG5VhrhlE32JBroL4hemrfo6 jy3smbG11zDalHQ/WRQesXEVMUBEsJdVorRJ4mrhEFBHEsbco7ZD8AFFE5jUfClYB8gR YT67Msjm3sci2VeU0ypkWLXy1hftQmw210ICRtaztD6nXjwxSh0ZBWiVJwLX5mID8nSX yEF32zJDk0WGvcjxE8qjIigjAr1reDRZwz0VUoUix6/gVgEy4fUokxoGNqSZ+ke+e4jD 28b+gJ1sI2P0G6aaw6DfpW6KreHeI3t10oEDpMfDm42In30RnYMmy1eDYxYLae6BeoJT BlqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2CqQTZgcTWRzSq2vJB9BxJAh0GSOJkWXDwhd8wzWGE07a3JYIi ZGCYLpN/YsVLb0N4XYeq9AN/7g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv9sWxbnpeMRWqiM+cTYJKGzMXvNJsp7SDb2PVAVwCDDAyVZTC6Mxm+NU97kEdmTimNfqkYPw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2e03:: with SMTP id u3mr9972910pgu.205.1585251787183; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder (104-188-17-28.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [104.188.17.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 132sm2321984pfc.183.2020.03.26.12.43.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:43:04 -0700 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Suman Anna Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] remoteproc: use a local copy for the name field Message-ID: <20200326194304.GB59436@builder> References: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> <20200324201819.23095-3-s-anna@ti.com> <20200326054234.GA59436@builder> <2089a4a8-d5e4-e4f5-e7bc-7d053f654204@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2089a4a8-d5e4-e4f5-e7bc-7d053f654204@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200326_124308_433905_DF589921 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.51 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Poirier , Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu 26 Mar 07:01 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > On 3/26/20 12:42 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Tue 24 Mar 13:18 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote: > > > >> The current name field used in the remoteproc structure is simply > >> a pointer to a name field supplied during the rproc_alloc() call. > >> The pointer passed in by remoteproc drivers during registration is > >> typically a dev_name pointer, but it is possible that the pointer > >> will no longer remain valid if the devices themselves were created > >> at runtime like in the case of of_platform_populate(), and were > >> deleted upon any failures within the respective remoteproc driver > >> probe function. > >> > >> So, allocate and maintain a local copy for this name field to > >> keep it agnostic of the logic used in the remoteproc drivers. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna > >> --- > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 9 ++++++++- > >> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 2 +- > >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> index aca6d022901a..6e0b91fa6f11 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> @@ -1989,6 +1989,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev) > >> > >> kfree(rproc->firmware); > >> kfree(rproc->ops); > >> + kfree(rproc->name); > >> kfree(rproc); > >> } > >> > >> @@ -2061,7 +2062,13 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name, > >> } > >> > >> rproc->firmware = p; > >> - rproc->name = name; > >> + rproc->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); > > > > Let's use kstrdup_const() instead here (and kfree_const() instead of > > kfree()), so that the cases where we are passed a constant we won't > > create a duplicate on the heap. > > > > And the "name" in struct rproc can remain const. > > Agreed, that's better functions to use for this. > > > > >> + if (!rproc->name) { > >> + kfree(p); > >> + kfree(rproc->ops); > >> + kfree(rproc); > >> + return NULL; > > > > Perhaps we can rearrange the hunks here slightly and get to a point > > where we can rely on the release function earlier? > > Not sure I understand. I don't see any release function, all failure > paths in rproc_alloc() directly unwind the previous operations. You mean > move this to before the alloc for rproc structure, something similar to > what we are doing with firmware? > Look at the failure for ida_simple_get(), there we're past the setup of rproc->dev.type, so the rproc_type->release function will be invoked as we call put_device(). So if you move the initialization of rproc->dev up right after the allocation of rproc we should be able to rely on that to clean up all these for us. Regards, Bjorn > regards > Suman > > > > > > Regards, > > Bjorn > > > >> + } > >> rproc->priv = &rproc[1]; > >> rproc->auto_boot = true; > >> rproc->elf_class = ELFCLASS32; > >> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > >> index ddce7a7775d1..77788a4bb94e 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > >> @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment { > >> struct rproc { > >> struct list_head node; > >> struct iommu_domain *domain; > >> - const char *name; > >> + char *name; > >> char *firmware; > >> void *priv; > >> struct rproc_ops *ops; > >> -- > >> 2.23.0 > >> > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel