From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA74DC43331 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EEF6206E6 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="T0SfMbhg" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6EEF6206E6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=lOgw9VHQY1Vu60lfVXeJlmtbLhQizTDeHTAnKUrLk3I=; b=T0SfMbhgkNZICzTVPv8qPN8yMj X3GWCofpBxJR2PCoPf0z0anXo4nl467iBtT6HXNIZ/KEGwSAB37liVn0awoEDE7mFBLn13cGuzQfD Tm0J9b9CNUIYkvE9fLiFHxTxe3EEe+ZlgI3tAGCPfrH+cKpPl1vEE6tbJDOhWGriFDTAIcCaySFW5 Tya77EiyciJFsH3yu/XFrYpX4BdeYKAn+SXbhQR3Gv791AYqlo3n7NBT8fhDGJUiNHp2eMkKqrfoQ F1PPlUVwwrHnxXOBx+NQHGtly2TK18+dv+6xq+0oQPe+P8ZnFpv8Mg6ED0uL4KWZLeOFAHPsXEanw 8UOlyVFw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jHryx-00065K-HE; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:37:19 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jHryn-0005vp-P3 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:37:10 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D42131B; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 894EE3F71F; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:37:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan Subject: [PATCH 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Make mutex channel specific Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:36:51 +0000 Message-Id: <20200327163654.13389-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200327163654.13389-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <20200327163654.13389-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200327_093709_853364_1848921C X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.90 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, Sudeep Holla MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org In order to support multiple SMC/HVC transport channels with associated shared memory, it is better to maintain the mutex per channel instead of existing global one. Move the smc_mutex into the scmi_smc structure and also rename it to shmem_lock which is more appropriate for it's use. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c index 336168e40f49..6dc8a88cc91b 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c @@ -27,11 +27,10 @@ struct scmi_smc { struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo; struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem; + struct mutex shmem_lock; u32 func_id; }; -static DEFINE_MUTEX(smc_mutex); - static bool smc_chan_available(struct device *dev, int idx) { return true; @@ -78,6 +77,7 @@ static int smc_chan_setup(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct device *dev, scmi_info->func_id = func_id; scmi_info->cinfo = cinfo; + mutex_init(&scmi_info->shmem_lock); cinfo->transport_info = scmi_info; return 0; @@ -102,14 +102,14 @@ static int smc_send_message(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info; struct arm_smccc_res res; - mutex_lock(&smc_mutex); + mutex_lock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock); shmem_tx_prepare(scmi_info->shmem, xfer); arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(scmi_info->func_id, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res); scmi_rx_callback(scmi_info->cinfo, shmem_read_header(scmi_info->shmem)); - mutex_unlock(&smc_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock); return res.a0; } -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel