From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF3AC2BA2B for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC217208E4 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ejWa84y7"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HOJFDPMO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DC217208E4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1GrxcVhVpYE9MJeyoY9ghFG1yh2rF/WDJLdwXN8dJNg=; b=ejWa84y781oFBo 1DF41XLFLKcgZr6vWFYb8jhTUljfJrb+j3pQ9hGp4heU/tJj4QRvlS08HhbhslRiKwdgJtj0At8+E m7l3G9GacFmL3CoxpCNSTJu+7g21erYgz+J5VTYObtvhomY9dvGnJ1olOr8w4it6yQjibW/c+yRxH OrU8xJw8ckYZhkywwp8P7XYvCA4PDajc3JYAuQwvG4Ta1lsB9kfknMlbUP2jc+1ZWSulp1a7gOc1s 9YAyMd13RjDxZ9Kgi9nyzqTkqrDk2vHarv6BkP05AqG57mZbER6R9bKt7gJsGCK9FlfDigbMlzOeN yjiUzmdPPFs3khJa8roA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jMsFM-0002fP-HV; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:54:56 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jMsFJ-0002f4-OT for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:54:54 +0000 Received: from willie-the-truck (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33F8220769; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:54:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586519692; bh=o+CQzbgHOG2tsd35vnw41EOBr4volv2Kz4qD+fukZOU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HOJFDPMOO8WGt4clfPskCQhqsc7GzEp6Wi3CvIRqOenKQpGl0DnGbd9nqoGSOuM5e rHZWZaWhsuvvKPaN0PJb5yxa+cI0bg7WxiSPu9Dtn6CkhUxVYzUGOlmm1PUYH+mTYw 0MnRDcAYtLU9QqCtGfVXBC8qgEDs4EQl2/mTCgGY= Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:54:46 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Hanjun Guo Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] arm64: cpufeatures: add support for tlbi range instructions Message-ID: <20200410115446.GA24814@willie-the-truck> References: <5DC960EB.9050503@huawei.com> <20191111132716.GA9394@willie-the-truck> <5DC96660.8040505@huawei.com> <3b833c82-2c1b-462a-f06f-d4c8b373dac1@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200410_045453_816113_1960E86E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.52 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, Rob Herring , wanghuiqiang , Anna.Chen@arm.com, Zhenyu Ye , catalin.marinas@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, 'Matteo Carlini' , xiexiangyou@huawei.com, Linuxarm , Shaokun Zhang , tangnianyao@huawei.com, Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:43:49AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2019/11/20 9:29, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > > > > > I also wonder if the ARMv8.4-TTL extension (which I have patches for in > > > the nested virt series) requires the same kind of treatment (after all, > > > it has an implicit range based on the base granule size and level). > > > > > > In any way, this requires careful specification, and I don't think > > > we can improvise this on the ML... ;-) > > > > Sure :), the good news is that ARM officially announced will be > > working with Huawei again. > > > > So if I understand your point correctly, we need steps to take: > > - ARM spec needs to make TIBi by range crystal clear and being > > written down in the spec; > > - Firmware description of supporting TLBi by range in system level > > for both FDT and ACPI; > > - Then upstream the code. > > Do we have update here? I noticed that the TLBI by rang for SMMU is > merged for upstream from Rob, any plan or progress for the CPU side? > > Sorry to ping you on the mailling list, our upcoming new chip has > this feature and it's good to enable it, so it's a bit urgent for us. Have you tried look at the latest version of the patches rather than "pinging" old history? We're also in the merge window at the moment, so please cut us some slack. I also fail to see the urgency. This thing is a pure performance play, and a fairly niche one at that. I'm not especially comfortable ripping up our TLBI code without being able to test it. Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel