From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA39C2BA19 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF0052063A for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="pNIzFjmo"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LLnblHt6" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CF0052063A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=w7rwhRKycB5vUJyRD/EzDiYnss5z2Mz2rzQaowecXkg=; b=pNIzFjmoXa55Sv /ang6QkWUAvHtBYSDcKW5IwbJJmvzPgLcOS1cQbKRjVC/aLpq/ArY0fAE0syw06f5A5FiegMNMxqv 0jmqy4y8jPKg56t9j41oYa0tTF6e5LViavDv+fl0fFD8rG2XY3AmEtU5joE7lyUO/bEwGXEZuzEO8 ZJrRcynryj7RcPrJeaV1V6QTxOasbB7l+BffTQ/68+KtVcf6IrRF45bv35nGLgPV3c1CM6qMvrFBU Qx+7KneQ9DKElQu2HPdsFy2zU+cnqZJlXOKM98gc4b1MTWAUnVr7A4Y+JnPHD8mnHc11n8/CPA1i0 e5RdErkzzmQNOhO/kpNg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jOLZG-0000lg-4u; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:25:34 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jOLUE-0000sh-8N for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:20:24 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AB282075E; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:20:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586870421; bh=UpxxYfMQiPsStRBk2vSRrNmutVvInJSvPdMUZH13yMc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LLnblHt6MLccFn5zAeLwboh9LyZ5CVGfTwofL8QWEMrv0rCDOpvm0ymMexeZYvaWx COY3VPn+iOPcTK7ulvc5KT9nmMikRIpnp9hXgHQm03ggEcRW7XRf40C5P4D04Fkf96 uI+uNGJHcAMB78gOwhRnxStZyeTvZWHQtBYxrrWs= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jOLUB-003A4M-GJ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:20:19 +0100 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:20:18 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/meson-gpio: Fix HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order Message-ID: <20200414142018.6e7e5ec3@why> In-Reply-To: <20200407144658.829246-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20200407144658.829246-1-maz@kernel.org> Organization: Approximate X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, khilman@baylibre.com, jbrunet@baylibre.com, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200414_062022_370098_0D4EB244 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.02 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Martin Blumenstingl , Kevin Hilman , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Jerome Brunet Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 15:46:58 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote: +Jerome, Martin, > Running a lockedp-enabled kernel on a vim3l board (Amlogic SM1) > leads to the following splat: > > [ 13.557138] WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected > [ 13.587485] ip/456 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: > [ 13.625922] ffff000059908cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq+0xf8/0x8d8 > [ 13.632273] which would create a new lock dependency: > [ 13.637272] (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (&ctl->lock){+.+.}-{2:2} > [ 13.644209] > [ 13.644209] but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: > [ 13.654122] (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2} > [ 13.654125] > [ 13.654125] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: > [ 13.664759] lock_acquire+0xec/0x368 > [ 13.666926] _raw_spin_lock+0x60/0x88 > [ 13.669979] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x30/0x178 > [ 13.674082] generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50 > [ 13.678098] __handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xc8 > [ 13.682209] gic_handle_irq+0x5c/0xb0 > [ 13.685872] el1_irq+0xd0/0x180 > [ 13.689010] arch_cpu_idle+0x40/0x220 > [ 13.692732] default_idle_call+0x54/0x60 > [ 13.696677] do_idle+0x23c/0x2e8 > [ 13.699903] cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x50 > [ 13.703852] rest_init+0x1e0/0x2b4 > [ 13.707301] arch_call_rest_init+0x18/0x24 > [ 13.711449] start_kernel+0x4ec/0x51c > [ 13.715167] > [ 13.715167] to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: > [ 13.722426] (&ctl->lock){+.+.}-{2:2} > [ 13.722430] > [ 13.722430] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: > [ 13.732319] ... > [ 13.732324] lock_acquire+0xec/0x368 > [ 13.735985] _raw_spin_lock+0x60/0x88 > [ 13.739452] meson_gpio_irq_domain_alloc+0xcc/0x290 > [ 13.744392] irq_domain_alloc_irqs_hierarchy+0x24/0x60 > [ 13.749586] __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x160/0x2f0 > [ 13.754254] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0x118/0x320 > [ 13.759073] irq_create_of_mapping+0x78/0xa0 > [ 13.763360] of_irq_get+0x6c/0x80 > [ 13.766701] of_mdiobus_register_phy+0x10c/0x238 [of_mdio] > [ 13.772227] of_mdiobus_register+0x158/0x380 [of_mdio] > [ 13.777388] mdio_mux_init+0x180/0x2e8 [mdio_mux] > [ 13.782128] g12a_mdio_mux_probe+0x290/0x398 [mdio_mux_meson_g12a] > [ 13.788349] platform_drv_probe+0x5c/0xb0 > [ 13.792379] really_probe+0xe4/0x448 > [ 13.795979] driver_probe_device+0xe8/0x140 > [ 13.800189] __device_attach_driver+0x94/0x120 > [ 13.804639] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xd8 > [ 13.808474] __device_attach+0xe4/0x168 > [ 13.812361] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28 > [ 13.816592] bus_probe_device+0xa4/0xb0 > [ 13.820430] deferred_probe_work_func+0xa8/0x100 > [ 13.825064] process_one_work+0x264/0x688 > [ 13.829088] worker_thread+0x4c/0x458 > [ 13.832768] kthread+0x154/0x158 > [ 13.836018] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 > [ 13.839612] > [ 13.839612] other info that might help us debug this: > [ 13.839612] > [ 13.850354] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: > [ 13.850354] > [ 13.855720] CPU0 CPU1 > [ 13.858774] ---- ---- > [ 13.863242] lock(&ctl->lock); > [ 13.866330] local_irq_disable(); > [ 13.872233] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); > [ 13.878705] lock(&ctl->lock); > [ 13.884297] > [ 13.886857] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); > [ 13.891014] > [ 13.891014] *** DEADLOCK *** > > The issue can occur when CPU1 is doing something like irq_set_type() > and CPU0 performing an interrupt allocation, for example. Taking > an interrupt (like the one being reconfigured) would lead to a deadlock. > > A solution to this is: > > - Reorder the locking so that meson_gpio_irq_update_bits takes the lock > itself at all times, instead of relying on the caller to lock or not, > hence making the RMW sequence atomic, > > - Rework the critical section in meson_gpio_irq_request_channel to only > cover the allocation itself, and let the gpio_irq_sel_pin callback > deal with its own locking if required, > > - Take the private spin-lock with interrupts disabled at all times > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c > index ccc7f823911b..bc7aebcc96e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c > @@ -144,12 +144,17 @@ struct meson_gpio_irq_controller { > static void meson_gpio_irq_update_bits(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl, > unsigned int reg, u32 mask, u32 val) > { > + unsigned long flags; > u32 tmp; > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctl->lock, flags); > + > tmp = readl_relaxed(ctl->base + reg); > tmp &= ~mask; > tmp |= val; > writel_relaxed(tmp, ctl->base + reg); > + > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctl->lock, flags); > } > > static void meson_gpio_irq_init_dummy(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl) > @@ -196,14 +201,15 @@ meson_gpio_irq_request_channel(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl, > unsigned long hwirq, > u32 **channel_hwirq) > { > + unsigned long flags; > unsigned int idx; > > - spin_lock(&ctl->lock); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctl->lock, flags); > > /* Find a free channel */ > idx = find_first_zero_bit(ctl->channel_map, NUM_CHANNEL); > if (idx >= NUM_CHANNEL) { > - spin_unlock(&ctl->lock); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctl->lock, flags); > pr_err("No channel available\n"); > return -ENOSPC; > } > @@ -211,6 +217,8 @@ meson_gpio_irq_request_channel(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl, > /* Mark the channel as used */ > set_bit(idx, ctl->channel_map); > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctl->lock, flags); > + > /* > * Setup the mux of the channel to route the signal of the pad > * to the appropriate input of the GIC > @@ -225,8 +233,6 @@ meson_gpio_irq_request_channel(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl, > */ > *channel_hwirq = &(ctl->channel_irqs[idx]); > > - spin_unlock(&ctl->lock); > - > pr_debug("hwirq %lu assigned to channel %d - irq %u\n", > hwirq, idx, **channel_hwirq); > > @@ -287,13 +293,9 @@ static int meson_gpio_irq_type_setup(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl, > val |= REG_EDGE_POL_LOW(params, idx); > } > > - spin_lock(&ctl->lock); > - > meson_gpio_irq_update_bits(ctl, REG_EDGE_POL, > REG_EDGE_POL_MASK(params, idx), val); > > - spin_unlock(&ctl->lock); > - > return 0; > } > -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel