stop messing with set_fs in arm_sdei

stop messing with set_fs in arm_sdei

[Christoph Hellwig]

Hi James,

can you take a look at this series?  I've been trying to figure out
what the set_fs in arm_sdei is good for, and could not find any
good reason.  But I don't have any hardware implementing this interface,
so the changes are entirely untested.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_sdei: remove unused interfaces

[Christoph Hellwig]

The export symbols to register/unregister and enable/disable events
aren't ever used outside of arm_sdei.c, so mark them static.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c | 13 +++++--------
 include/linux/arm_sdei.h    | 15 ---------------
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
index 334c8be0c11f..bdd6461647d7 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static void _local_event_enable(void *data)
 	sdei_cross_call_return(arg, err);
 }
 
-int sdei_event_enable(u32 event_num)
+static int sdei_event_enable(u32 event_num)
 {
 	int err = -EINVAL;
 	struct sdei_event *event;
@@ -429,7 +429,6 @@ int sdei_event_enable(u32 event_num)
 
 	return err;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdei_event_enable);
 
 static int sdei_api_event_disable(u32 event_num)
 {
@@ -447,7 +446,7 @@ static void _ipi_event_disable(void *data)
 	sdei_cross_call_return(arg, err);
 }
 
-int sdei_event_disable(u32 event_num)
+static int sdei_event_disable(u32 event_num)
 {
 	int err = -EINVAL;
 	struct sdei_event *event;
@@ -471,7 +470,6 @@ int sdei_event_disable(u32 event_num)
 
 	return err;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdei_event_disable);
 
 static int sdei_api_event_unregister(u32 event_num)
 {
@@ -502,7 +500,7 @@ static int _sdei_event_unregister(struct sdei_event *event)
 	return sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_unregister, event);
 }
 
-int sdei_event_unregister(u32 event_num)
+static int sdei_event_unregister(u32 event_num)
 {
 	int err;
 	struct sdei_event *event;
@@ -533,7 +531,6 @@ int sdei_event_unregister(u32 event_num)
 
 	return err;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdei_event_unregister);
 
 /*
  * unregister events, but don't destroy them as they are re-registered by
@@ -603,7 +600,8 @@ static int _sdei_event_register(struct sdei_event *event)
 	return err;
 }
 
-int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg)
+static int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb,
+		void *arg)
 {
 	int err;
 	struct sdei_event *event;
@@ -643,7 +641,6 @@ int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg)
 
 	return err;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdei_event_register);
 
 static int sdei_reregister_event_llocked(struct sdei_event *event)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h
index 0a241c5c911d..5f9fb1d95d51 100644
--- a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h
+++ b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h
@@ -22,21 +22,6 @@
  */
 typedef int (sdei_event_callback)(u32 event, struct pt_regs *regs, void *arg);
 
-/*
- * Register your callback to claim an event. The event must be described
- * by firmware.
- */
-int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg);
-
-/*
- * Calls to sdei_event_unregister() may return EINPROGRESS. Keep calling
- * it until it succeeds.
- */
-int sdei_event_unregister(u32 event_num);
-
-int sdei_event_enable(u32 event_num);
-int sdei_event_disable(u32 event_num);
-
 /* GHES register/unregister helpers */
 int sdei_register_ghes(struct ghes *ghes, sdei_event_callback *normal_cb,
 		       sdei_event_callback *critical_cb);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/2] arm_sdei: remove the set_fs calls in sdei_event_handler

[Christoph Hellwig]

There are only two callbacks that can be called, which both
eventually end up calling __ghes_sdei_callback.

__ghes_sdei_callback calls irq_work_queue which is a normal
kernel helper called from all kinds of contexts and
ghes_in_nmi_queue_one_entry.  ghes_in_nmi_queue_one_entry is
also called from other code without messing with the address
limit, so it better work without it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
index bdd6461647d7..1c51b378dfca 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
@@ -1137,19 +1137,12 @@ int sdei_event_handler(struct pt_regs *regs,
 		       struct sdei_registered_event *arg)
 {
 	int err;
-	mm_segment_t orig_addr_limit;
 	u32 event_num = arg->event_num;
 
-	orig_addr_limit = get_fs();
-	set_fs(USER_DS);
-
 	err = arg->callback(event_num, regs, arg->callback_arg);
 	if (err)
 		pr_err_ratelimited("event %u on CPU %u failed with error: %d\n",
 				   event_num, smp_processor_id(), err);
-
-	set_fs(orig_addr_limit);
-
 	return err;
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(sdei_event_handler);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: stop messing with set_fs in arm_sdei

[James Morse]

Hi Christoph,

On 14/04/2020 15:23, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> can you take a look at this series?  I've been trying to figure out
> what the set_fs in arm_sdei is good for, and could not find any
> good reason.  But I don't have any hardware implementing this interface,
> so the changes are entirely untested.

Its a firmware thing, think of it as a firmware assisted software NMI.

The arch code save/restores set_fs() because the entry code does that when taking an
exception from EL1. SDEI does the same because it doesn't come via the same entry code. It
does it in C because that C is always run before the handler, something that isn't true
for the regular assembly version.

The regular entry code does this because any exception may have interrupted code that had
addr_limit set to something else:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=822

and the patch that fixed it: commit e19a6ee2460b "arm64: kernel: Save and restore UAO and
addr_limit on exception entry"


Thanks,

James

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: stop messing with set_fs in arm_sdei

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:59:16PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On 14/04/2020 15:23, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > can you take a look at this series?  I've been trying to figure out
> > what the set_fs in arm_sdei is good for, and could not find any
> > good reason.  But I don't have any hardware implementing this interface,
> > so the changes are entirely untested.
> 
> Its a firmware thing, think of it as a firmware assisted software NMI.
> 
> The arch code save/restores set_fs() because the entry code does that when taking an
> exception from EL1. SDEI does the same because it doesn't come via the same entry code. It
> does it in C because that C is always run before the handler, something that isn't true
> for the regular assembly version.
> 
> The regular entry code does this because any exception may have interrupted code that had
> addr_limit set to something else:
> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=822
> 
> and the patch that fixed it: commit e19a6ee2460b "arm64: kernel: Save and restore UAO and
> addr_limit on exception entry"

Can you throw in a comment documenting this better?  And pick up the
first patch while we're at it - no need to expose such low-level
mechanisms to modules.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel