From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB51C83001 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC54B2223E for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="C3rwr9i/"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="xcp870w9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CC54B2223E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=9x5OkJhcE3MZuQUuTBqYee29ZplP0ayAaPKGzFkQ3DU=; b=C3rwr9i/9o/cSt JNOQA5bXcD1weFGkFujmJRj3dAlz8+kFMpFyDhcmX2Sl8HjJMcvIL+wBp6bWBcOyW6dE4TLl/lkOg +1RqYESWchxm0CVbSMQ1mUKV0aYEQ6SiQP+a9gZPv9Hy74GgkrFsuSBH5kd8CDjOjg09OpXVckwJa ytaAtTTXsAgtqLlg57gFAkW6KtGI8yAOKzSymii1vJwNEJ5H8T8B2GLiBSV/DcWus+uDFq+s0ryVC FAfU/hZcb2dYZbVhJe8I827TVqYXaGd7DM/Ekiao2OukxjJ+gv8EjLwe6AGPqld89WNeQLcSk/J6g +NpseGrzNe6fz/dInzHg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jTS0A-0000Lu-FM; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:18:26 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jTS07-0000Kf-TZ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:18:25 +0000 Received: from willie-the-truck (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6158721D7E; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:18:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588087103; bh=9oQXKzUc/g5RDIdNHtQ174HwUol535uO19Er/7MH5yw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=xcp870w9uUfWNAP5Q279qYhxIPzCRshrYgFnamYTozhK+oloqXxKG+YBbR7ToARB+ OQBaqZz1emiEUG2oQO4j5PPdf2AJQMuFqOVLI30sp6OaLbd0nO6qyn3eHHMGoISqIj GQ6C69MgmQ/+WBhMltBfpIDeF5rVyQuNGPHpxDG0= Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:18:16 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support Message-ID: <20200428151815.GB12697@willie-the-truck> References: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200422154436.GJ4898@sirena.org.uk> <20200422162954.GF3585@gaia> <20200428132804.GF6791@willie-the-truck> <20200428151205.GH5677@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200428151205.GH5677@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200428_081823_972631_8C08591E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.23 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Paul Elliott , Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Andrew Jones , Amit Kachhap , Vincenzo Frascino , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Szabolcs Nagy , "H . J . Lu " , Yu-cheng Yu , Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Jann Horn , Richard Henderson , Kristina =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C5=A1enko?= , Alexander Viro , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Florian Weimer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Sudakshina Das Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:12:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 02:28:05PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > I'm happy either way, but it would be nice to base other BTI patches on > > top of this branch. Mark -- is it easier for you to refresh the series > > against v5.7-rc3, or leave it like it is? Please just let me know either > > way. > > It's probably easier for me if you just use the existing branch, I've > already got a branch based on a merge down. Okey doke, I'll funnel that in the direction of linux-next then. It does mean that any subsequent patches for 5.8 that depend on BTI will need to be based on this branch, so as long as you're ok with that then it's fine by me (since I won't be able to apply patches if they refer to changes introduced in the recent merge window). Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel