From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775D7C83003 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A1C92073E for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="a11bDZgo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0A1C92073E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=fS7nPfEfMVpMmi+zAUQ6pYZTDoQLJGlGUQmnDlTB0hE=; b=a11bDZgoFL77QW lNe8PndR2Kh7RENO+X5o89XAgm+90zqtW5hafRJXDCPXDfRDS5ioLDAr/ZcuDrSGRt7UW6NbLr5Ot 9LUZ6TkWxViIuABuZ/1J0xKnvTNssFarHvzpulCb9T/OzO/XHKlh9uqmBoDw9rc8hSIeMZoG0Q4IU EMekIZwJ0hfLBhTc3QOm9IvUvbNOsnfZEy+mvjLh6BB31dbeXULZASshxzHVGyZXWpt2JbWpJ+kCd qQ+R37Kp1w02eAlHny44YW8cKV/CFus43Hfy+uL+r0iPTTCupcaqgSVqPTERINJCAJOPB9pTLHWG+ mjlR7ybn12UBav8rssXg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jTjxI-0005TG-H0; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:28:40 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jTjwp-00053c-0B for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:28:13 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E97C14; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 03:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93CF83F73D; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 03:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:28:06 +0100 From: Dave Martin To: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/23] fs: Allow copy_mount_options() to access user-space in a single pass Message-ID: <20200429102806.GD30377@arm.com> References: <20200421142603.3894-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <20200421142603.3894-21-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <20200427165641.GC15808@arm.com> <20200428140626.GJ3868@gaia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200428140626.GJ3868@gaia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200429_032811_247711_B3E80527 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.72 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Richard Earnshaw , Szabolcs Nagy , Andrey Konovalov , Kevin Brodsky , Peter Collingbourne , linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Viro , Vincenzo Frascino , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:06:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 05:56:42PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:26:00PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > The copy_mount_options() function takes a user pointer argument but not > > > a size. It tries to read up to a PAGE_SIZE. However, copy_from_user() is > > > not guaranteed to return all the accessible bytes if, for example, the > > > access crosses a page boundary and gets a fault on the second page. To > > > work around this, the current copy_mount_options() implementations > > > performs to copy_from_user() passes, first to the end of the current > > > page and the second to what's left in the subsequent page. > > > > > > Some architectures like arm64 can guarantee an exact copy_from_user() > > > depending on the size (since the arch function performs some alignment > > > on the source register). Introduce an arch_has_exact_copy_from_user() > > > function and allow copy_mount_options() to perform the user access in a > > > single pass. > > > > > > While this function is not on a critical path, the single-pass behaviour > > > is required for arm64 MTE (memory tagging) support where a uaccess can > > > trigger intra-page faults (tag not matching). With the current > > > implementation, if this happens during the first page, the function will > > > return -EFAULT. > > > > Do you know how much extra overhead we'd incur if we read at must one > > tag granule at a time, instead of PAGE_SIZE? > > Our copy routines already read 16 bytes at a time, so that's the tag > granule. With current copy_mount_options() we have the issue that it > assumes a fault in the first page is fatal. > > Even if we change it to a loop of smaller uaccess, we still have the > issue of unaligned accesses which can fail without reading all that's > possible (i.e. the access goes across a tag granule boundary). > > The previous copy_mount_options() implementation (from couple of months > ago I think) had a fallback to byte-by-byte, didn't have this issue. > > > I'm guessing that in practice strcpy_from_user() type operations copy > > much less than a page most of the time, so what we lose in uaccess > > overheads we _might_ regain in less redundant copying. > > strncpy_from_user() has a fallback to byte by byte, so we don't have an > issue here. > > The above is only for synchronous accesses. For async, in v3 I disabled > such checks for the uaccess routines. Fair enough, I hadn't fully got my head around what's going on here. (But see my other reply.) I was suspicious about the WARN_ON(), but I see people are on top of that. Cheers ---Dave _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel