From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EE6C4724C for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 21:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5483724954 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 21:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="PDmtZKGG"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Uerb66Ar" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5483724954 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=8j+LVLfncV9nDlT59UeaUxJG8FpgrpbfhQfnvie818c=; b=PDmtZKGGlXSwUR fBaWOpmrMBd9kKW22miwqNDifdp/3PWc9S5TRFnwuEMEsaY3Ci2o0FA344nfAhNPYYdc8HVKa02q0 6fE4D9MXRadM8r5dZN9UYC6XpvKrW1Chan2L2HmSTUDMOcNj4bfPutfAqDPJs4QE/rfTKuTK0mGjV 0QPy6NC+Z71TE/OMiHwznPhVVJU/8w7YPyfl4IoYfGm9ooHincVMMitwRdjSrrNsdrv09HfzxBACa drm79QG+JUpWHKXXgS/tv6mmfVb2Gnc0eF9aHeSzMYS4s8j8ybSebV8T3gfbxKAtbaRcZvthm4Jsy 3S5v5qwEgSgbmtn/gXGQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jUGhX-0000t5-MC; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 21:26:35 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jUGhT-0000sU-Vo for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 21:26:33 +0000 Received: from willie-the-truck (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0E112166E; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 21:26:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588281991; bh=uWky6TNBymUqSLkL11ZzartRuKqUlPuvanXrysasMkM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Uerb66Arhg5vhl7hcybSXvksTonsCmKFdJefGcHkKMVr/lMrnQV3W1SU6xQoz+pI0 RE39P+64BgmzRvjs0ZSjXa8yV5+5WfUx7KSDiyjU+TsaTP7CBSjQ5f3B4Np6V13L2B OaGgWhEyi+eZlWVYMSp1aRYwZqusI1Vbyq7Sa8fI= Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 22:26:24 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support Message-ID: <20200430212623.GA802@willie-the-truck> References: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200422154436.GJ4898@sirena.org.uk> <20200422162954.GF3585@gaia> <20200428132804.GF6791@willie-the-truck> <20200428151205.GH5677@sirena.org.uk> <20200428151815.GB12697@willie-the-truck> <20200428155808.GJ5677@sirena.org.uk> <20200428160141.GD12697@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200428160141.GD12697@willie-the-truck> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200430_142632_042429_A7C876EA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.72 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Paul Elliott , Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Andrew Jones , Amit Kachhap , Vincenzo Frascino , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Szabolcs Nagy , "H . J . Lu " , Yu-cheng Yu , Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Jann Horn , Richard Henderson , Kristina =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C5=A1enko?= , Alexander Viro , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Florian Weimer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Sudakshina Das Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:01:43PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:58:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:18:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:12:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > It's probably easier for me if you just use the existing branch, I've > > > > already got a branch based on a merge down. > > > > > Okey doke, I'll funnel that in the direction of linux-next then. It does > > > mean that any subsequent patches for 5.8 that depend on BTI will need to > > > be based on this branch, so as long as you're ok with that then it's fine > > > by me (since I won't be able to apply patches if they refer to changes > > > introduced in the recent merge window). > > > > That's not a problem, that's what I've got already and if I try to send > > everything based off -rc3 directly the series would get unmanagably > > large. Actually unless you think it's a bad idea I think what I'll do > > is go and send out a couple of the preparatory changes (the insn updates > > and the last bit of annotation conversions) separately for that branch > > while I finalize the revisions of the main BTI kernel bit, hopefully > > that'll make the review a bit more approachable. > > Okey doke, sounds good to me. I'm queuing stuff atm, so as long you tell > me what I need to apply things against then we should be good. Just a heads up: I've renamed for-next/bti to for-next/bti-user, so it doesn't get confusing with the pending in-kernel BTI patches. All the commit SHAs remain unchanged. Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel