From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6463C47258 for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 05:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9439C206EB for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 05:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="s8B6RE+B"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dQS/jPaz" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9439C206EB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=QI7i+766dYPxzlcKC9IdkZzxCahUg2xY6mdK1OPLqIQ=; b=s8B6RE+BtAdNkC jJM4ZOBEUXP1Cd2zP49ZdFpJa0eo8EoW1WURX76blS64J0XvxsGhlAQiPhquUQdt5OkD+TdT/kq0s DA+RWTbfnbPnXgzd93YWx9vl/Hf6ZkH5+PA7Pc2AVrCZYJ08HzvHzp9nIJVYPTxHoIZHd65ceQCZS zdPrKB0qOOrehnUb6uThwaafSexvxJRmT/kgmOM+7HEzBQWHDFJ+bN1fEerWIDkORbc2st7Uiz+vf H3Uso9qiCvXzzXzqdNwDR0S4IfdnBGLGG2C+wDbF47Jc0mRcB07/hwWUyMb1BL5NXQzpU8kKyJzg4 qugBzVfd84Mq+2EXGcVw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jVTHf-000304-9Y; Mon, 04 May 2020 05:04:51 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jVTHc-0002zB-AE; Mon, 04 May 2020 05:04:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [171.76.84.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0488206EB; Mon, 4 May 2020 05:04:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588568688; bh=uC1pih+roQvwyhTev/L0dbHWDrWGsjBiyYcYdiKyvnY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dQS/jPaz1EZ2HGweB8C3vAqHoOlHKALAfbdAmZKuny5/FPENQi1dPTy+POlsZgYyQ 2UjaeSS5S92HESh6a7KqqWmfnvVQX1VwsyjComKoruRNg0TGB70oTH3DLfb1N5nIAh ZNJikxLezQrsqLY2UAK8f1qIqmySzy28k59PvvAQ= Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 10:34:43 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Cristian Ciocaltea Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] dmaengine: owl: Use correct lock in owl_dma_get_pchan() Message-ID: <20200504050443.GD1375924@vkoul-mobl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200503_220448_394811_3035B75D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.17 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manivannan Sadhasivam , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 02-05-20, 20:15, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > When the kernel is built with lockdep support and the owl-dma driver is > used, the following message is shown: > > [ 2.496939] INFO: trying to register non-static key. > [ 2.501889] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. > [ 2.507357] turning off the locking correctness validator. > [ 2.512834] CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.6.3+ #15 > [ 2.519084] Hardware name: Generic DT based system > [ 2.523878] Workqueue: events_freezable mmc_rescan > [ 2.528681] [<801127f0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010da58>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) > [ 2.536420] [<8010da58>] (show_stack) from [<8080fbe8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xe0) > [ 2.543645] [<8080fbe8>] (dump_stack) from [<8017efa4>] (register_lock_class+0x6f0/0x718) > [ 2.551816] [<8017efa4>] (register_lock_class) from [<8017b7d0>] (__lock_acquire+0x78/0x25f0) > [ 2.560330] [<8017b7d0>] (__lock_acquire) from [<8017e5e4>] (lock_acquire+0xd8/0x1f4) > [ 2.568159] [<8017e5e4>] (lock_acquire) from [<80831fb0>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3c/0x50) > [ 2.576589] [<80831fb0>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<8051b5fc>] (owl_dma_issue_pending+0xbc/0x120) > [ 2.585884] [<8051b5fc>] (owl_dma_issue_pending) from [<80668cbc>] (owl_mmc_request+0x1b0/0x390) > [ 2.594655] [<80668cbc>] (owl_mmc_request) from [<80650ce0>] (mmc_start_request+0x94/0xbc) > [ 2.602906] [<80650ce0>] (mmc_start_request) from [<80650ec0>] (mmc_wait_for_req+0x64/0xd0) > [ 2.611245] [<80650ec0>] (mmc_wait_for_req) from [<8065aa10>] (mmc_app_send_scr+0x10c/0x144) > [ 2.619669] [<8065aa10>] (mmc_app_send_scr) from [<80659b3c>] (mmc_sd_setup_card+0x4c/0x318) > [ 2.628092] [<80659b3c>] (mmc_sd_setup_card) from [<80659f0c>] (mmc_sd_init_card+0x104/0x430) > [ 2.636601] [<80659f0c>] (mmc_sd_init_card) from [<8065a3e0>] (mmc_attach_sd+0xcc/0x16c) > [ 2.644678] [<8065a3e0>] (mmc_attach_sd) from [<8065301c>] (mmc_rescan+0x3ac/0x40c) > [ 2.652332] [<8065301c>] (mmc_rescan) from [<80143244>] (process_one_work+0x2d8/0x780) > [ 2.660239] [<80143244>] (process_one_work) from [<80143730>] (worker_thread+0x44/0x598) > [ 2.668323] [<80143730>] (worker_thread) from [<8014b5f8>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) > [ 2.675708] [<8014b5f8>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) > [ 2.682912] Exception stack(0xee8fdfb0 to 0xee8fdff8) > [ 2.687954] dfa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > [ 2.696118] dfc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > [ 2.704277] dfe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 > > The obvious fix would be to use 'spin_lock_init()' on 'pchan->lock' > before attempting to call 'spin_lock_irqsave()' in 'owl_dma_get_pchan()'. > > However, according to Manivannan Sadhasivam, 'pchan->lock' was supposed > to only protect 'pchan->vchan' while 'od->lock' does a similar job in > 'owl_dma_terminate_pchan()'. > > Therefore, this patch substitutes 'pchan->lock' with 'od->lock' and > removes the 'lock' attribute in 'owl_dma_pchan' struct. Applied, thanks -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel