From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC618C47254 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A4F206CC for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="W4c37JLM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 74A4F206CC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=atomide.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=QJnez7pqeHS1RTz7nIMwZowERSI8JLgFln9Y3EXbCKA=; b=W4c37JLMzK4xG6 GOtd35eDY38ogvQcoYlVCxBfVaDhpLW3pIBuQWz1R9pa87yugfd6AYqw3GA6vsW5k2YFn3/eC3TQ2 RXCzGS8S8zejIirdJhQbw+KEpOD3VmU4ukiVCYHIBC1BUJVkxoz3JYaSUsoJ8TaWFsCqEG6xLcxRF njegNKkJt8wIjqsGED/kfWANLxkQ+QwznndKkv4fzAY/SKPBXv9OedNJ49lt54J6JJpamRW0/fw6l Q8uTOBPlcp95RqsE7vR49HQ6X8N7vTyzFUc/jnnFwdeqlOqV/1bkMiM5VZ6ZteXvHmdZJ3vFdfX/B /PipVUHuwQJnCNwLouaQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jW25T-00014C-HP; Tue, 05 May 2020 18:14:35 +0000 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jW25R-000137-8f for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 18:14:34 +0000 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F93F80A5; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 11:14:28 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Tero Kristo Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: dts: dra7/am57xx: remoteproc support Message-ID: <20200505181428.GO37466@atomide.com> References: <20200424151244.3225-1-t-kristo@ti.com> <20200424155128.GK37466@atomide.com> <5f8d4dbb-f4fc-ee97-8542-610e98d3f895@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5f8d4dbb-f4fc-ee97-8542-610e98d3f895@ti.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200505_111433_349277_3073FC6A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: s-anna@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org * Tero Kristo [200424 15:55]: > On 24/04/2020 18:51, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Tero Kristo [200424 08:13]: > > > Hi Tony, > > > > > > This series adds the DT nodes necessary for remoteproc support, now that > > > the driver side changes are (mostly) in. Couple of things to note > > > though. > > > > > > 1) There is a new IOMMU issue, for which I posted a fix today [1] > > > 2) The remoteproc core still has an issue for which there is ongoing > > > discussion [2] > > > > > > With these two issue taken care of, the omap remoteproc support is > > > functional. The question though is, whether we should just wait until > > > the above two issues are resolved and merge the DT patches post that, or > > > merge the DT patches with status = "disabled". > > > > If there are no dependencies between the pending driver fixes and > > the dts changes I see no reason to not merge the dts changes. > > Yeah, no hard dependencies as such, just that things won't work properly > before they are in. Applying these all into omap-for-v5.8/dt thanks. Tony _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel