linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>,
	Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Ben Dooks \(Codethink\)" <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
	Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: perf_event: Fix time offset prior to epoch
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 13:21:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512112158.GD3001@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512091918.GH2978@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:19:18AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Now, your arm64 counter is 56 bits, so wrapping is rare, but still, we
> should probably fix that. And that probably needs an ABI extention
> *sigh*.

Something like so, on top of the other (2).

---

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1174,6 +1174,7 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct pe
 
 	userpg->cap_user_time = 0;
 	userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 0;
+	userpg->cap_user_time_short = 0;
 
 	do {
 		rd = sched_clock_read_begin(&seq);
@@ -1184,13 +1185,16 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct pe
 		userpg->time_mult = rd->mult;
 		userpg->time_shift = rd->shift;
 		userpg->time_zero = rd->epoch_ns;
+		userpg->time_cycle = rd->epoch_cyc;
+		userpg->time_mask = rd->sched_clock_mask;
 
 		/*
 		 * This isn't strictly correct, the ARM64 counter can be
-		 * 'short' and then we get funnies when it wraps. The correct
-		 * thing would be to extend the perf ABI with a cycle and mask
-		 * value, but because wrapping on ARM64 is very rare in
-		 * practise this 'works'.
+		 * 'short' and then we get funnies when it wraps. But this
+		 * 'works' with the cap_user_time ABI.
+		 *
+		 * When userspace knows about cap_user_time_short, it
+		 * can do the correct thing.
 		 */
 		userpg->time_zero -= (rd->epoch_cyc * rd->mult) >> rd->shift;
 
@@ -1215,4 +1219,5 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct pe
 	 */
 	userpg->cap_user_time = 1;
 	userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 1;
+	userpg->cap_user_time_short = 1;
 }
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -532,9 +532,10 @@ struct perf_event_mmap_page {
 				cap_bit0_is_deprecated	: 1, /* Always 1, signals that bit 0 is zero */
 
 				cap_user_rdpmc		: 1, /* The RDPMC instruction can be used to read counts */
-				cap_user_time		: 1, /* The time_* fields are used */
+				cap_user_time		: 1, /* The time_{shift,mult,offset} fields are used */
 				cap_user_time_zero	: 1, /* The time_zero field is used */
-				cap_____res		: 59;
+				cap_user_time_short	: 1, /* the time_{cycle,mask} fields are used */
+				cap_____res		: 58;
 		};
 	};
 
@@ -593,13 +594,29 @@ struct perf_event_mmap_page {
 	 *               ((rem * time_mult) >> time_shift);
 	 */
 	__u64	time_zero;
+
 	__u32	size;			/* Header size up to __reserved[] fields. */
+	__u32	__reserved_1;
+
+	/*
+	 * If cap_usr_time_short, the hardware clock is less than 64bit wide
+	 * and we must compute the 'cyc' value, as used by cap_usr_time, as:
+	 *
+	 *   cyc = time_cycles + ((cyc - time_cycles) & time_mask)
+	 *
+	 * NOTE: this form is explicitly chosen such that cap_usr_time_short
+	 *       is an extention on top of cap_usr_time, and code that doesn't
+	 *       know about cap_usr_time_short still works under the assumption
+	 *       the counter doesn't wrap.
+	 */
+	__u64	time_cycles;
+	__u64	time_mask;
 
 		/*
 		 * Hole for extension of the self monitor capabilities
 		 */
 
-	__u8	__reserved[118*8+4];	/* align to 1k. */
+	__u8	__reserved[116*8];	/* align to 1k. */
 
 	/*
 	 * Control data for the mmap() data buffer.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-12 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-05 13:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: perf_event: Fix time offset prior to epoch Leo Yan
2020-05-05 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] time/sched_clock: Add new variant sched_clock_register_epoch() Leo Yan
2020-05-05 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Handle time offset prior to epoch Leo Yan
2020-05-05 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: perf_event: Fix time_offset for arch timer Leo Yan
2020-05-11  9:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: perf_event: Fix time offset prior to epoch Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-11  9:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12  6:38     ` Leo Yan
2020-05-12  8:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12  9:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12 10:01         ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-12 11:21         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200512112158.GD3001@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=a.darwish@linutronix.de \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexios.zavras@intel.com \
    --cc=allison@lohutok.net \
    --cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=info@metux.net \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).