From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>,
Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Ben Dooks \(Codethink\)" <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: perf_event: Fix time offset prior to epoch
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 13:21:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512112158.GD3001@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512091918.GH2978@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:19:18AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Now, your arm64 counter is 56 bits, so wrapping is rare, but still, we
> should probably fix that. And that probably needs an ABI extention
> *sigh*.
Something like so, on top of the other (2).
---
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1174,6 +1174,7 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct pe
userpg->cap_user_time = 0;
userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 0;
+ userpg->cap_user_time_short = 0;
do {
rd = sched_clock_read_begin(&seq);
@@ -1184,13 +1185,16 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct pe
userpg->time_mult = rd->mult;
userpg->time_shift = rd->shift;
userpg->time_zero = rd->epoch_ns;
+ userpg->time_cycle = rd->epoch_cyc;
+ userpg->time_mask = rd->sched_clock_mask;
/*
* This isn't strictly correct, the ARM64 counter can be
- * 'short' and then we get funnies when it wraps. The correct
- * thing would be to extend the perf ABI with a cycle and mask
- * value, but because wrapping on ARM64 is very rare in
- * practise this 'works'.
+ * 'short' and then we get funnies when it wraps. But this
+ * 'works' with the cap_user_time ABI.
+ *
+ * When userspace knows about cap_user_time_short, it
+ * can do the correct thing.
*/
userpg->time_zero -= (rd->epoch_cyc * rd->mult) >> rd->shift;
@@ -1215,4 +1219,5 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct pe
*/
userpg->cap_user_time = 1;
userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 1;
+ userpg->cap_user_time_short = 1;
}
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -532,9 +532,10 @@ struct perf_event_mmap_page {
cap_bit0_is_deprecated : 1, /* Always 1, signals that bit 0 is zero */
cap_user_rdpmc : 1, /* The RDPMC instruction can be used to read counts */
- cap_user_time : 1, /* The time_* fields are used */
+ cap_user_time : 1, /* The time_{shift,mult,offset} fields are used */
cap_user_time_zero : 1, /* The time_zero field is used */
- cap_____res : 59;
+ cap_user_time_short : 1, /* the time_{cycle,mask} fields are used */
+ cap_____res : 58;
};
};
@@ -593,13 +594,29 @@ struct perf_event_mmap_page {
* ((rem * time_mult) >> time_shift);
*/
__u64 time_zero;
+
__u32 size; /* Header size up to __reserved[] fields. */
+ __u32 __reserved_1;
+
+ /*
+ * If cap_usr_time_short, the hardware clock is less than 64bit wide
+ * and we must compute the 'cyc' value, as used by cap_usr_time, as:
+ *
+ * cyc = time_cycles + ((cyc - time_cycles) & time_mask)
+ *
+ * NOTE: this form is explicitly chosen such that cap_usr_time_short
+ * is an extention on top of cap_usr_time, and code that doesn't
+ * know about cap_usr_time_short still works under the assumption
+ * the counter doesn't wrap.
+ */
+ __u64 time_cycles;
+ __u64 time_mask;
/*
* Hole for extension of the self monitor capabilities
*/
- __u8 __reserved[118*8+4]; /* align to 1k. */
+ __u8 __reserved[116*8]; /* align to 1k. */
/*
* Control data for the mmap() data buffer.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-05 13:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: perf_event: Fix time offset prior to epoch Leo Yan
2020-05-05 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] time/sched_clock: Add new variant sched_clock_register_epoch() Leo Yan
2020-05-05 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Handle time offset prior to epoch Leo Yan
2020-05-05 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: perf_event: Fix time_offset for arch timer Leo Yan
2020-05-11 9:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: perf_event: Fix time offset prior to epoch Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-11 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12 6:38 ` Leo Yan
2020-05-12 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12 10:01 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-12 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200512112158.GD3001@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=a.darwish@linutronix.de \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexios.zavras@intel.com \
--cc=allison@lohutok.net \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=info@metux.net \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).