From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE90C433DF for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 10:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 646EE2074D for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 10:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="KP65fVYk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 646EE2074D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=yUBtUuFMlSRQNQIt6JCTx53OkhqA9VlFhC1WnaCqdGw=; b=KP65fVYk0EGFZb KH3XHBSwgb0lueJS0H3P2iHYa07F1uSkw/XkjUA4ZoAX0/hRp4Ri/zL6dLdsZ263s8lJUUAQjoX1g CWro9Q/qy13MmQDtDLa+Q45V6y9mQ2jj20GMupiP7ZiEuw1pP5BbhiIhuXLOUWabBXJZz9xQo+C6C JiRc905T+oyBoVogYtxmcJG6CCoyNXE4EWXGLqKcIdKJwwoOxYYh+6xOXXQxpQKelkSDy1Oum6Xly EXVp9Nddz6xu71F7QFZN6jRiMKaPOAM0xwxCJ4Y4eTDLAVQsZ22B1lfIRHSj5FcWVaxh3w+zmKhEq tJXJhuwmL4u4jPAGvUyw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jZXUn-0007Pa-Bk; Fri, 15 May 2020 10:23:13 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jZXUi-0007PC-Gs for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 10:23:09 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1094C2F; Fri, 15 May 2020 03:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.37.12.6]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D6513F71E; Fri, 15 May 2020 03:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:22:56 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: psci: Fixup execution order when entering a domain idle state Message-ID: <20200515102255.GA25927@bogus> References: <20200511133346.21706-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20200514142015.GA23401@bogus> <20200514172816.GA42669@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200515_032308_605786_8613D560 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.15 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Benjamin Gaignard , Linux PM , Stephen Boyd , Daniel Lezcano , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Lina Iyer , Bjorn Andersson , Sudeep Holla , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:11:50PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > No worries, thanks for reviewing. > You are welcome. > That said, are you fine with Rafel queuing this then? > I am fine with that. However I told if you need fixes tags as there are no users of the notification yet in the kernel. Though this is trivial, but do we need this backported to stable kernel. I don't have strong opinion and leave it to you and Rafael. Acked-by: Sudeep Holla -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel